Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve TWO CPU vs ONE CPU

  • TWO CPU vs ONE CPU

    Posted by Ergin on October 13, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    hi,

    I just purchased daVinci resolve and i need to buy MAC PRO.

    I have 2 options;

    Option 1 (used-2008): TWO 2.8Ghz quad core (Nehalem processor)
    Option 2 (new-2010) : ONE 2.8Ghz Quad core (Intel Xeon procesor)
    both are the same price;
    all optins are the same (ram, cards etc)

    which one should i buy for better daVinci performance..
    firts option has 2CPU but old processor and the second one is newer but single CPU

    regards

    Ergin replied 15 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Vladimir Kucherov

    October 13, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    2008 8 core Mac Pro is now certified (with 8bit video output enabled)
    The 4 core 2010 model is not certified. From what we hear it generally isn’t fast enough to decode and do realtime quality.

  • Ergin

    October 13, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    hi Vladimir

    what does 8bit video output enabled? does it mean better MAC pros has 10 bit or better option?

    do you think that older 2CPU is faster than newer single CPU version?

  • Robert Houllahan

    October 13, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    I think the quad 2010 2.66 nehalem is a certified machine so I would think that the quad 2.8 2010 would be. There are refurb mac pro’s on the apple store right now and if you get a dual cpu you could eventually switch out the cpu’s for faster units, if you are careful.

    -Rob-

    https://www.cinelab.com

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    October 13, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    Basically the problem, as I understand it, is there are multiple measures of performance in these systems.

    For example, the limiting factor on a 2008 Mac Pro is bus speed (if i remember correctly) which makes it difficult to pipe enough data through an otherwise strong processor.

    The limiting factor on a quad core 2010 is processor speed and number of cores, which really hurts performance when working with compressed codecs (ProRes, RED, etc). You *may* be able to get away with it with DPXs, but no quad core computer is officially certified.

    What BM did to enable support for 2008 Mac Pros is enable an extra 8 bit monitoring mode, which means that the image prepared for monitor output is smaller in size and detail, reducing bandwith, allowing the 2008 8-core mac pro to work in realtime. 10 bit monitoring option is always available, but in my experience it drops performance down to 22 frames or so.

    I would honestly say that you should try and swing it for the 8 core 2010 model, or an 8 core 2009 model. Yes it’s a bit more money but your system will be *solid* with no caveats.

  • Dwaine Maggart

    October 14, 2010 at 12:59 am

    Below, from the config guide. No single proc systems recommended.

    Early 2008, Two 2.8GHz Quad Core
    or
    Early 2008, Two 3.0GHz Quad Core
    or
    Early 2008, Two 3.2GHz Quad Core

    Early 2009, Two 2.26GHz Quad Core
    or
    Early 2009, Two 2.66GHz Quad Core
    or
    Early 2009, Two 2.93GHz Quad Core
    or
    Mid 2010, Two 2.4GHz Quad Core
    or
    Mid 2010, Two 2.66GHz 6-Core
    or
    Mid 2010, Two 2.93GHz 6-Core

    Dwaine Maggart
    Blackmagic Design DaVinci Support

  • Ergin

    October 14, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    ok finally i bought
    Mid 2010, Two 2.4GHz Quad Core with 6gb ram
    now im waiting for davinci 🙂

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy