-
Transcoding or not?
I have heard that i should transcode imported media to “Proxy media” and “Optimized media” so FCPX easier and faster editing.
We film motorsports (cars and motorcycle sports) and catamaran sailing (but what we film don’t matter) in 1080p with a few different cameras. All cameras uses H.264 so the file size are not to bad even after a weekend of filming.
Yesterday we started an import of “some hours” of filming. Decided to transcode the media. Only to find that the size of the library increased by a factor of (about) 10. The original folder size are 45,72 GB and the “transcoded media” – folder are now 454,6 GB where “proxy media” are 65,25 GB and “high quality media” are 389,34 GB. All media are stored on FireWire800 disks in different Raid setups for working and backup disks. Switching between projects with and without proxy media don’t really make any difference in speed.
In my opinion it should take longer to “open and view” a 10 GB (transcoded) file than a 1 GB (original) file in FCPX. Even the “proxy media” are larger than the originals.
We are all (sounds like we are hundreds but we are three people) works with 27″ i5’s with 4 GB ram and 1 TB internal hard drives (if that matters).
So here’s the real question: What exactly are the benefits of transcoding video in FCPX? FCPX works great with H.264 when it comes to speed. No glitches and it renders great.