-
tracks for different formats needed or worthwhile?
New to Adobe Pro CS 5.5.- Maybe a simple question.
I shoot, because of my location, multi formats per job. Some Canon 7D footage, some Canon xf300 mxf , sometimes AVCHD from a friends camera, when he is helping. Is it better to create tracks within the sequences for each format in a project, or is it really “ok” or “best practices” to just dump them together on a “master timeline track” or ‘scene’ sequence that is created for the “A” camera, i.e. in my case, the 305 MXF footage? I know that I often do use multiple tracks for B roll, but I’m wondering if by mixing and intercutting B toll from a different format (mov) into an A roll of mxf I’m creating problems.In my reading it appears that I should simply create the master sequence (my videos are short music videos for this current client), say use the MXF footage, then add the 7D mov footage inter spliced as the B camera. All on one timeline track. Correct? Or even if the B roll becomes A roll (not sure but I think it might happen) then leave the different formatted footage on the separate track. I’m just confused about the notion that the sequence is created for the MXF footage, and I’m adding mov footage to the track.
I also assume as I create a longer documentary I’m working on, that each ‘scene’ or location shoot should be it’s own sequence, with A and B rolls, and then nest them together on a ‘master’ sequence at the end.
I understand that for multi camera editing I need a nested sequence, and then drop that sequence into the master sequence, with titles added to yet another track on the timeline. Correct? Or are folks just dropping the title(s) into the master timeline, adding the multi camera clip into the master timeline in a linear way to the title? i.e. Master sequence track one= titles, multi camera nested and credits. Or are folks dropping titles and credits onto their own tracks? (I’ve always done it that way). Obviously, for overlays I would use the additional tracks on the sequence.
Al