-
Today we celebrate Drop Frame Timecode in the U.S.A.
4th of July—How video tech would have varied if…
https://www.provideocoalition.com/4th-of-julyhow-video-tech-would-have-varied-if/- There would have never been any NTSC video system.
- There would have never been a 60 field per second rate for the grayscale (“black and white”) television system.
- The non-existent 60 field per second rate would have never had to change to ≈59.94 in 1953 for color (or colorized) TV.
- The non-existent 30 frames per second would have never had to change to ≈29.97 in 1953 for color (or colorized) TV.
- I would probably be writing that word as “colour”, and the other one as “greyscale”.
- The only worldwide television field rate would have been 50, for both grayscale and color.
- The worldwide television framerate would have been 25 for both greyscale and color.
- Manufacturing of TV sets, monitors, time base correctors and recorders would have been greatly simplified.
- There would have been no hue adjustments on TV sets or monitors.
- There would be no ≈3.58 MHz subcarrier in production, only ≈4.43 MHz.
- Those time base correctors that offered subcarrier feedback would have been ≈4.43 MHz only.
- There would have been no need for drop frame timecode, and therefore, there would have been no need to call the only remaining one “non-drop” timecode. There would just be timecode, a single standard for television.
- Color framing in direct-color VTRs would have been standardized (or “standardised”) to a single 8-field (4 frame) color frame sequence.
- There would have been no segregated cameras. They would all be worldcams (See my 2015 article Why we should only use worldcams, illustrated above), and no one would appreciate them as being especially desirable, or call them that way.
- Many of my articles would never have needed to be written, since they would have been non-existent topics, so I would have had more time to write about other ones.