-
tired subject vs vs etc…thoughts?
well we’ve been going back and forth about which to buy (kona/bmd) for a new high end full featured finishing suite. the cost of the card is of no consequence. a grand, 2 grand 3 or 4. who cares? the rest of the gear dwarfs that.
we’ve been decklink evangelists for years, but reasons to switch now are:1. autodesk and avid use kona
why is this important?
we have had client after client look down on us because we don’t have SMOKE or FLAME. and this is mostly for basic conform onlines!
they are convinced that an FCP based system is a toy. but 10bit is 10bit right? well, you tell an LA producer or director that.
we are actually talking to autodesk reps right now about putting a system in just to have THE NAME.
well common sense is winning out and a top of the line mac based system with the best hardware/software/monitoring available is making a hell of alot more sense to us (both workflow and $)so with kona we can at least say we have the same video I/O hardware as the big name systems…
other reasons? none
I love the BMD line, but too many people in town see the FCP/BMD systems as budget/low end (= affordable). true? I don’t know.ps. we lost some big dvd authoring jobs because we use the 10bit capture/software mpeg encode workflow and not the SONIC hardware encode solutions. (DVD producers are subject to the same namebrand snobbery)
well we just talked to sonic and they have DISCONTINUED their hardware encode cards and now recommend 10bit capture (3rd party card)/software encode with THEIR software!
I wish those (3 years ago) clients could hear that now.