Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy timecode in milliseconds

  • Jeremy Garchow

    February 17, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    Frames aren’t good enough?

    What do you need to do?

  • Arnie Schlissel

    February 17, 2008 at 9:55 pm

    Timecode, by definition of SMPTE, is in frames.

    Arnie
    Now in post: Peristroika, a film by Slava Tsukerman
    https://www.arniepix.com/blog

  • Adrianna Merlucci

    February 17, 2008 at 10:21 pm

    A friend is doing a neurological experiment and needs to note time down to the millisecond.

  • Walter Biscardi

    February 17, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    [adrianna merlucci] “A friend is doing a neurological experiment and needs to note time down to the millisecond.”

    that’s not timecode. timecode is by frames, not milliseconds. you’ll need some sort of scientific instrument that can display milliseconds on the video feed.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Shane Ross

    February 17, 2008 at 10:51 pm

    And the reason for all of this is that you can’t show anything less than a frame. Now, if you have a high speed camera, that might have built in software that will do both. I seem to recall getting that when I received high speed footage from such cameras.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD now for sale!
    http://www.LFHD.net
    Read my blog!

  • Rennie Klymyk

    February 17, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    It might be possible to find a digital read out millisecond clock that you could include in the picture frame when filming. Similar to shooting a t/c slate but this would be a millisecond clock like they have a racetracks. SEIKO/EPSON makes most of them.

    “everything is broken” ……1st. coined by Esther Philips I believe.

  • Andreas Kiel

    February 18, 2008 at 12:05 am

    As Shane said, there is no need (or no sense) to display timecode in milliseconds with normal video. Video is always recorded in frames per second.
    With high-speed cams which go up to a 1000 frames or more the frames may not have two digits but more. But this is special and custom.
    With audio which records at 48 kHz (or whatever else kHz) you will have quite lot of apps which do show the timecode with milliseconds – or again “audio frames”.

    Regards
    Andreas

    Spherico
    https://www.spherico.com/filmtools

  • Thaxter Clavemarlton

    February 18, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    Even with the milliseconds displayed, it won’t be in any way “accurate to the millisecond” as during EACH recorded frame, 33+ milliseconds will have ticketed-by for the frame’s duration.

    Each successive frame of video will be 33+ milliseconds in length.

    Standard film and video are very inaccurate and imprecise in recording and working with such high speeds and short time-measurements.

  • Rennie Klymyk

    February 20, 2008 at 1:20 am

    Uh, Dah… good catch Thax.

    A computer monitor should be capable of faster counts but as soon as you tie it into a video application in preparation for window dubs you’d lose it.

    “everything is broken” ……1st. coined by Esther Philips I believe.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy