-
The part of post-production I think AI actually helps
Hey all — long time CC reader, first time posting here. Editor/producer, 20+ years in production (LA → FL).
Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about the review side of post-production.
Not editing itself, or even AI video generation, but the actual review process.
It feels like there are more edits now than ever now. More AI video means more versions, which means more notes, more cooks in the kitchen, more revision cycles.
And honestly, I don’t think AI really helps much with taste (or instinct, or storytelling overall).
But I do think there’s something useful in the idea of a cut getting a fresh set of second eyes – if even just to sanity check it – before the next human review.
So I’ve been building an AI tool for editors, producer and directors that literally is those second eyes. It’s called RoughCut AI
The basic idea is pretty simple:
- upload a cut
- RCAI watches/listens
- gives timestamped feedback back on pacing, clarity, continuity, etc.
What I’m paying attention to now isn’t whether people think it’s interesting.
It’s whether editors actually run it more than once. Is it “as valuable a tool” as I think it is?
If anyone’s working on short-form stuff and wants to try it out, I’m happy to share access. Not selling anything here, no cost involved, just genuinely curious where RoughCut AI fits (or doesn’t) in real workflows.