Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › The new Mac Mini
-
The new Mac Mini
Posted by Steve Connor on November 18, 2016 at 12:35 pmMark Smith replied 9 years, 5 months ago 8 Members · 9 Replies -
9 Replies
-
Jeremy Garchow
November 18, 2016 at 4:19 pmBut it “only” has USB-c (not Thunderbolt 3). How would anyone get ANY work done, let alone design Bridges, buildings, and other heavy structures that will carry, house, and/or employ human beings and their vehicles?? Why doesn’t it have quad GPUs and weigh 148 pounds?
Why must I always feel the need to sarcast?
-
Mark Suszko
November 18, 2016 at 8:28 pmI don’t get the angle about this being great for CAD work. And this is not a mac mini vs. hp mini issue, but an overall form-factor issue. A small-footprint independent computer suggests a mobile, or at least intentionally portable, user experience, or at least, an installation that is more “field”- like than “office”-like. For example, I could see a small computer like this hooked to a 3-d printer or CNC router or laser engraver. Even though all of those things can run off a thumb drive or internal memory, but let’s leave it for the sake of argument. I can see a small format machine like this connected to VR experiences. Or used in the music-recording/production and DJ business areas. But what’s the advantage of a small footprint, with inherent compromises in performance or other features/ options, in a static, standard office/desk environment like CAD? Or, is there some gain from rack-mounting a bunch of these into a massive array? This may be a cool platform for certain applications, but you’re pitching it for CAD work? Like the scene in “Big”, when Tom Hanks is asked to play-test the robots that turn into buildings… “I don’t get it”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ERuhks3GNkSome contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Shawn Miller
November 18, 2016 at 9:11 pm[Mark Suszko] “I don’t get the angle about this being great for CAD work. And this is not a mac mini vs. hp mini issue, but an overall form-factor issue. A small-footprint independent computer suggests a mobile, or at least intentionally portable, user experience, or at least, an installation that is more “field”- like than “office”-like. For example, I could see a small computer like this hooked to a 3-d printer or CNC router or laser engraver. Even though all of those things can run off a thumb drive or internal memory, but let’s leave it for the sake of argument. I can see a small format machine like this connected to VR experiences. Or used in the music-recording/production and DJ business areas. But what’s the advantage of a small footprint, with inherent compromises in performance or other features/ options, in a static, standard office/desk environment like CAD? Or, is there some gain from rack-mounting a bunch of these into a massive array? This may be a cool platform for certain applications, but you’re pitching it for CAD work? Like the scene in “Big”, when Tom Hanks is asked to play-test the robots that turn into buildings… “I don’t get it”.”
Mini PC’s are good from a power consumption, space and heat standpoint. The trend in bigger office environments is fewer closed offices, fewer permanent desk assignments, smaller cubicles and more open, collaborative work spaces. A mini PC also makes sense for very small, enclosed offices where heat and noise can affect your daily comfort.
Shawn
-
Shawn Miller
November 18, 2016 at 10:18 pm[Mark Suszko] “Then why not laptops?”
You can put more RAM and a Xeon processor in a mini PC. It’s also not unusual for a company to assign multiple devices to a single employee, so lots of people have a workstation and a laptop or tablet.
Shawn
-
Richard Herd
November 21, 2016 at 11:12 pm[Mark Suszko] “an overall form-factor issue.”
They look really cool.
-
Ricardo Marty
November 22, 2016 at 4:35 pmI think that the new surface studio has better Tech specs and ergonomics for a cad user. Maybe more expensive but well worth it.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio/tech-specs
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio/overview
Ricardo Marty
-
Mark Smith
November 23, 2016 at 3:27 pmI own a mini that is a 4 core i7 CPU. It seems like there certainly in a case for form factor like the mini that has some processing power and takes up very little space. Connect monitors and keyboards that suit you and away you go.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up