Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro That crazy should I rebuild or not question, but I’m stuck.

  • Steven Davis

    June 28, 2015 at 3:55 pm
  • John Rofrano

    June 28, 2015 at 6:31 pm

    [Steven Davis] “I did put this together on Newegg,”

    Did you check to make sure that the memory has been tested with the motherboard? Just matching specs is playing Russian roulette. I would go to the motherboard web site and get the list of memory part numbers that were tested with that motherboard and only buy those part numbers of you want to guarantee a stable computer.

    [Steven Davis] “Rosewill ARC M550 Continuous 550W@40 C degree Power Supply”

    The ASUS Radeon R9 290X requires a minimum of a 750W PSU so that power supply is not going to cut it.

    I would also go for a liquid cooler because rendering video is going light up that CPU.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • John Rofrano

    June 28, 2015 at 8:59 pm

    [Steven Davis] “Here is a link to an mxf file.”

    Is this file directly from your camera or did you render it out of Vegas Pro? We should be testing with a file directly from your camera.

    Also, what exactly are we testing here? I downloaded the file and it plays back at full frame rate on Best | Full with Vegas Pro running in VMware Fusion on my MacBook Pro with no GPU acceleration. Does it playback fine for you? Did you want to give us a project that uses this file with typical FX that you would use and see if it plays back smoothly? and what about a render test. What format do you want us to render to?

    I’m just looking for something that you did and how long it took and then we can do the same and tell you how long it takes for us.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Aaron Star

    June 28, 2015 at 9:06 pm

    Converting the C300.mfx to Sony XDCAM-422.mfx was “no recompression” conversion. The XDCAM422 converted file showed identical time as the stock C300 file. Canon codec is simply a licensed xdcam codec with the rights to put their own label on it.

    For the file that was uploaded, with no effects, here are my results:

    16sec–XDCAM422-to-30p-10mbsMax-6mbAvg-MC-mp

    16sec-c300-to-30p-10mbsMax-6mbAvg-MC-mp4

    24sec-C300-to-30p-MC.MP4–10mbsMax–6mbsAvg–32bit-VL

    35sec–XDCAM422-to-30p-16mbs-SonyAVC

    35sec-C300-60i-16mbs-Vegas-Preset-SonyAVC

    38sec-HDCAM-SR-Lite-to-30p-16mbs-SonyAVC

    39sec-C300-to-30p-16mbs-SonyAVC–32bit-VL – you can see that as the math complexity goes up, the GPU is utilized more in 32bit mode with Sony AVC

  • Steven Davis

    June 28, 2015 at 10:55 pm

    Well that confirms it, seems the system is aged too much. And thanks everyone for the heads up on the build, I haven’t ordered it yet, so I’ll up the specs on the ps and cooling. I’ve never build a water cooled machine, so that’ll be a bit of curve.

    Thanks for running the tests, that was very helpful.

  • Steven Davis

    June 29, 2015 at 1:29 am

    Hey John,

    That is an mxf clip strait from the camera. Which is what I’m having a problem with rendering. Playback is pretty decent, but when I go to render an HD file such as an mp4, that’s where things slow down.

  • Graham Bernard

    June 29, 2015 at 3:23 am

    Steve, is your camera a XF300? I see a reference to CF300? However in your opening post you say XF300s? I’ve not seen a XF300s. What is the “s”? Has the XMF footage been processed by the Canon Utility or had you removed/copied the XMF Media from the complex Canon Capture folder structure?

    I use my MXF files via/from the Canon Utility that gives all XMF files ready to go. Do you?

    Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Scott Francis

    June 29, 2015 at 6:10 am

    I would go with a MINIMUM 750 watt PSU. You will need the headroom once everything is cooking. I have seen much higher performance in playback and rendering with the 290 series. So you should have good luck.

    Xavier (Scott) Francis
    Mind’s Eye Audio/Video Productions

  • John Rofrano

    June 29, 2015 at 11:31 am

    [Steven Davis] “I’ve never build a water cooled machine, so that’ll be a bit of curve. “

    You need to have a case that can support it but I used a CORSAIR H100 Extreme Performance Liquid CPU Cooler which required a Corsair Carbide Series 500R Black case but the H80 fits in almost any case I believe. One thing you don’t want to mess up on is adequate cooling for long renders. The liquid coolers are all self contained these days. They are as easy as installing a regular heat sink. You just need to have room for the radiator and fan in your case.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • John Rofrano

    June 29, 2015 at 11:37 am

    [Steven Davis] “That is an mxf clip strait from the camera. Which is what I’m having a problem with rendering.”

    OK, because I also loaded it into Final Cut Pro X and then I went into the metadata all of the camera information was blank. BTW, when people come here and complain that they can’t edit the native format from their camera, we tell them to render to Sony MXF because it handles like butter in Vegas Pro. So people are actually converting their camera footage into this format because it performs so well in Vegas. If your computer can’t handle it, it is definitely time for a new computer.

    [Steven Davis] “Playback is pretty decent, but when I go to render an HD file such as an mp4, that’s where things slow down.”

    So you are having problems rendering just the RAW file with no FX? That’s not good. I thought you only had problems after adding color correcting and stuff.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

Page 2 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy