Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Teranex vs. Edirol for SD to HD

  • Teranex vs. Edirol for SD to HD

    Posted by Matt Kerstein on September 14, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Getting ready to demo a Teranex VC-300 vs. a Edirol VC-200 with a workflow based on upconverting Component Beta SD to various HD flavors thru those boxes to compare image quality and overall performance. Hoping these boxes can live up to what appears in their specs. Anyone have experience with any of these Products? We’ll either get one of these or upgrade our KONA LHe’s to KONA3 with AV10 converters. Maybe Blackmagic Eclipse?? Still struggling thru this transition into the HD world. Kinda missing the simple one flavor, workhorse “bombproof” days of BETA SP!
    Matt

    Andy Mees replied 18 years, 8 months ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Andy Mees

    September 16, 2007 at 8:44 am

    Hey Matt
    The Teranex VC300 is a fantastic piece of kit with an ungodly level of control and excellent results in any number of format and standards conversions. If you have the budget then I can wholeheartedly recommend it. I don’t have experience of the Edirol so can’t offer a direct comparisson, but if you are looking to work with raw DV or HDV inputs and outputs then it may well be the preferable option
    Cheers
    Andy

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy