-
SWITCHed… and VERY happy! Report on FCP > Premiere Pro
Hello guys,
For the last week I have been using Adobe CS 5.5 and now a week later, I can quite honestly say I wish I had switched the day CS 5.5 came out. It has been an absolute joy to work with so much real time power, especially for the work I do where there are almost always effects to be applied.
There are many issues, gotchas and gripes I have with Premiere Pro, but on the other hand there are loads of things that delight me about PP. I have focussed more here on the things I found challenging in moving over… so it may be useful to those of you considering the move.
First, here is a youtube video I made talking about a couple of things I love most about PP: https://youtu.be/jBDhR_dDfSE
1/ mercury engine!!! fantastic on my i7 990 / 24gb / SSD HD / GTX580, friggin awesome responsiveness, real time effects etc… bliss!!!!!
2/ AE on timeline
3/ input almost any file format (I have come from mac to PC so that would also give me a big codec compatibility boost) and direct import from my EX-1 camera (no mov-wrapping needed).
4/ very good Keyframe Editor – very functional, works well and can be made full screen for fine tuning.
5/ history with descriptions
6/ way more plug-ins available, and many work with AE and PP
7/ dynamic filtering for effects panel
8/ ` key to maximise any panel you are mousing over, love that!
9/ VERY similar to FCP, a LOT more similar than Avid, and from my testing, a lot more flexible, open and more “new media” savvy.
MOST FRUSTRATING THINGS:
1/ Targetting/selecting of tracks is by far my biggest problem with PP… it is very frustrating and seems way over complicated and convoluted. IMO in 99% of circumstances there should never, ever be a need for editor to click on TWO target areas to be able to simply choose to which track media will be added… One tab is surely enough for almost all circumstances!? FCP was inconsistent with the two tabs meaning different things, for example inserting media and deleting media required that you select tracks differently… this does not make sense IMO as you are most usually working on a certain track, and need to be able to perform as few extra commands as possible. My suggestion is to have ONE tab that works for selecting that you will be editing to or deleting from that track. The assumption being there is ONE video track in the source footage. If the source footage has more than one video track, THEN and ONLY then should it be necessary to add a second mode for targetting. If one selects multiple tracks so one can mark, copy, paste etc, then it should be assumed that by default, the FIRST video track that is selected is V1. All tracks paste to the same track unless track selections are changed. If you copy and paste 4 video tracks but want to paste to different tracks, you copy the tracks, then deselect all tracks, and then reselect them starting from which track you want the lowest copied clip to paste to, then second selection is where the second lowest selected clip gets pasted etc… This is far simpler as it means there is never a need for the second tier of track selection as long as the source footage only has one Video track. In the case where there are two or more video tracks in the source, such as when you have a sub timeline in the source viewer, you would then need to add the second tier to assign a source track to a timeline track. At the moment there does not seem to be a way to add V2, V3, V4 to timeline tracks, even if there is another timeline in the source viewer which has multiple video tracks.
I would assign the keyboard numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 to toggle selection for video tracks 1, 2, 3, 4, making it VERY fast to decide which track is the target, and to re-assign the order if you want to paste tracks in a different order or to different tracks altogether.
2/ It is very strange that marking IO on the timeline and choosing CUT from the menu does not cut… in an editing programme it is extremely counter-intuitive… something that will baffle a lot of people. Also very odd, is that the term “lift” is not in the edit menu… Surely the command cut should apply to both selected clips AND area between IO on the timeline when there are no selected clips? The most basic command one could want to use in an editing programme is both hidden and confusing.
Cut and Paste should work, as most people would expect, to cut whats between the IN and OUT points IF there is no selected clip. Paste should happen at the IN point IF there is one and at the cursor if not. ALT-V could be used to paste backwards from the OUT point if there is one or cursor position if not.
Copy and Paste does not seem to work at all! I’m not sure how to copy all stuff between I and O points without the tedious work-around of splitting all clips on all tracks at both the in and out points, then marquis selecting the stuff between… very bad compared to just mark IO then Ctrl-C.
The terms Lift and Extract are very odd, I’m not sure why they are called that. Ripple delete is a term used in PP, and “Ripple Cut” would be understood by all editors whereas “Extract” is odd and does not sound like a ripple cut. Same goes for Lift. Surely it should simply be called Cut?
3/ save/autosave is very slow by comparison to fcp, and sometimes autosave can pop up while you are doing something, meaning you have to wait for it to go away before continuing.
4/ if multiple tracks are selected and you select one clip on V4 and copy paste it, the resulting clip should always be pasted on the track it came from, not v1, the lowest track that is selected, ie it should default to paste on the same track surely?
MOST MISSED ABOUT FCP7 (and a few points about fcpX):
1/ Motion-FCP templates
I miss motion and its ability to use drop zones, I have grown use to them, and they have become an integral part of building a look for a client for me… I am working on ways to emulate this functionality using the AE-PP dynamic linking.2/ alt-click drag a clip to copy a clip!
3/ open more than one project at a time
4/ Program monitor should show clip wireframe over clip when the clip is selected in the timeline so you can know which clip you have selected before making adjustments.
5/ fcpX now has background rendering (not that ive needed ANY rendering so far 😉
6/ snap on the razor blade. It should snap to cursor and to markers if snap is on.
7/ Keyboard delimiter to scale a clip in the viewer not proportionally (distort).
8/ There is a single key to IO mark a clip but it should select gaps too, not just clips!
IO selecting a section of the timeline should alter the colour of the section in the timeline that would be affected by a deletion, lift or extraction.9/ I like the T key in FCP to select clips on a track/s, with multiple clicks to toggle track select options
10/ keyboard command to razor all selected tracks at CTI position?
11/ In-Out selection should highlight the timeline area being marked in some (very attractive) way
12/ Keyboard command window does not prohibit the rest of the app being used. Sometimes you need to try things out and do not want to keep coming back to the customisation window to make further changes. It would be nice too if it remembered where you were in the list of commands when you return so you do not have to dig about.
For most of these negative aspects of PP, there are other ways of doing things, and in some cases, like track targeting, both FCP and PP get it wrong IMO… but there is a huge amount to like about Premiere, particularly that Adobe is very committed to making it “the Photoshop of editing”, something that is music to my ears after the insult apple dished out on their pro editor user base.
I hope that helps some of you, and hope to see you over at the Premiere forum.
Cheers,
Mark.Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.