I posted about this a year ago:
https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/277/22580
Unless things have changed since then, adding more comprehensive & customizable 3rd-party control surface support is low on BMDs priority list.
As much as I hate the de-valuation of the craft that has come with the commoditization and zero-cost accessibility of Resolve, it still seems odd to me that BMD is still tied to the notion that Resolve software is a loss-leader gateway drug towards selling more $30k BMD Resolve panels. It seems out of character with BMDs overall operating philosophy of “let’s-make-everything-that-used-to-be-expensive-unsustainably-cheap!”.
I would gladly pay $3000-$6000 for a version of Resolve that had a fully customizable shortcut-mapping & 3rd-party control surface interface. But this really makes no sense from a business and engineering standpoint, if you think about it. Maintaining separate branches of a software product as complex as Resolve would be a management, marketing and engineering nightmare. Adobe doesn’t even do this anymore (anyone remember when you used to have to pay an extra $1000 for the “Production Bundle” version of After Effects just to get motion tracking functionality?), and their engineering resources are undoubtedly way larger than BMD.
BMD would probably make a crap-ton more money–with almost zero additional engineering overhead–if they simply lowered the cost of the BMD Control Surface. Doing this would cause people like me, who are picky enough to be complaining about the lack of 3rd party control surface mappings, to just shut up and buy “the big panel”. This would free BMD’s Resolve team from wasting their time considering and implementing 3rd party panels, and they could spend more time concentrating on core software features.
Of course, if I were even half the brilliant businessman and marketing genius that Grant Petty is, I’d probably be spending more of my free time relaxing on a beach in the Bahamas, sipping Cristal from the shoes of my Caribbean handmaidens, instead of spending time offering unsolicited marketing and business advice to highly-successful corporations on internet messageboards.
I’m sure there are many good reasons why we haven’t seen any of these scenarios happen, as of yet. The people at BMD are certainly not stupid, and if they could deliver the full Resolve Panel for under $10,000, I’m sure they would. I would like to think that one of the main reasons why we have yet to see better 3rd-party panel support in Resolve is because they are working hard to eliminate the need to purchase 3rd-party panels in the first place. So why would they bother spending the time developing 3rd party support in Resolve 10, when they know that they will be eventually shipping a sub-$10000 panel that’s heads and tails better than every other currently available “cheap” 3rd-party panel?
I can at least dream that this is true. But BMD has an established track record in making dreams like this come true, so I’m definitely keeping my fingers crossed, and will continue to “tolerate” the existing state of control surface mappings until this happens!