Activity › Forums › Compression Techniques › Suggested Compression & file type
-
Suggested Compression & file type
Posted by Richard Walton on May 31, 2006 at 8:27 pmFCP (5.1)
QT Pro (7)
Squeeze Compression Suite (4.3)I want to export a series of 2-minute videos for embedding on a web page using the software listed above. Given the requirement that users with both dial-up and cable modem will be accessing these videos my questions are:
What would be a good mix of file types/data rates to upload to the server.
Display size will be 320×240.
Thanks!
Daniel_l replied 19 years, 9 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies -
7 Replies
-
Alexander Gao
June 1, 2006 at 5:13 amQuicktime H.264 would be good, and sorenson 3 quicktime. File sizes shouldn’t be a problem with these codecs.
Alexander Gao
“When the revolution happens, I’ll be leading it.”
-
Mike Smith
June 1, 2006 at 8:04 amExcept, of course, that many (maybe half) browsers do not have Quicktime plug-in support, and H.264 requires QT 7, further reducing the % of people you will reach.
You might want to look again at Flash video …
-
Daniel_l
June 1, 2006 at 9:55 amMmmmm – where do you get your (suspect) information from?
Video AllSorts
-
Mike Smith
June 1, 2006 at 2:43 pmIt’s very hard to get current, accurate data on what browsers have what plug-ins / ActiveX controls installed. You could look at this https://www.prestospace.org/project/deliverables/D12-6.pdf for more if you wanted to.
The “usual suspects” here are the Macromedia stats (hardly unbiased, suggesting 68% for QT) and the Frost & Sullivan report from 2004 – which also has to struggle through the same fog of data (suggesting around 37%).
Sfaik Apple does not publish an estimate for % of systems with QT player installed.Detailed web metrics from a sample of high-traffic sites would be most welcome, if anyone can point to them?
-
Daniel_l
June 1, 2006 at 2:50 pmiPod = iTunes = Quicktime.
Most iPod owners use Windows. All Macs have Quicktime. As such IMHO I’d lean more towards the 68% than 37%.BTW you don’t need Quicktime to view H.264 media, but it helps 😉
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264DL
Video AllSorts
-
Chris Harvey
July 16, 2006 at 7:12 pmi had this same question as i downconvert my ntsc videos for web use.
my web builders say .flv to prevent downloads
(i’m not offering downloads, it’s client owned design work.)i’m wondering if i should convert them to square pixels ?
iPod size 320×240 is a downsize of DV NTSC SQUARE PIZEL 720×540.
my originals are 720×480. any thoughts ?
-
Daniel_l
July 17, 2006 at 9:00 amI’d go with what your website builders are suggesting. Make sure they are encoding using the latest version of the Flash CODEC.
As for square vs non-square, this page may help:
https://lipas.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/conversion/#introductionDL
Video AllSorts
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up