Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro › Stutering playback in FCP X, specs should be ok?
-
Stutering playback in FCP X, specs should be ok?
Posted by Diego Barraza on June 21, 2012 at 3:25 pmHello bovine friends,
I have been editing FCP for 10 years or more and recently got a new top of the range imac to start fiddling with FCP X. I am running it with 4GB Ram and a external 2TB Gtech Drive for media storage. According to spec requirements of FCPX I should have no problems. I am cutting HDV origin footage. I have selected optimized media in the preferences. It works fine and I am able to go about the edit no problem at first, then after about 30min when I am getting going with the edit the playback of the timeline footage seems sluggish, it start to stutter and the audio and video start to go off synch. The project is 5min long and it should not be a problem to handle with my computers specs. It certainly was not a problem with FCP 7.
Anybody out there has any pointers of why this might be and how can I make this work more smoothly? I have been combing the forums but have not find a good solution.
I am really not about to drop FCP for AVID. I’ve had to much time with it to switch, but man, it is certainly no easy transition from FCP 7 to X.
Thanks,
filmmaking-editing-dop-dad
Chad Smith replied 13 years, 3 months ago 9 Members · 17 Replies -
17 Replies
-
Bill Davis
June 21, 2012 at 6:56 pmIt gets worse before it gets better. Then it gets MUCH better, IME.
There are a few dozen reasons you might be getting slow ups at various points in your workflow.
These can range from file format issues, to stack effects issues, to corrupt file issues, to many, MANY other things. And we can’t really tell you what you might be doing that contributes, since there are just way too many variables.
Remember, the NLE editing systems we learned on were largely built around the concepts of pre-limitations. You built a system to handle DV or HDCAM or perhaps Uncompressed – and when you had the hardware capable of doing that work- you just kept doing the same workflow over and over.
Now those old “consistencies” are largely gone. The market demands systems that handle everything from iPhone to DSLR to Red4k – and we expect it to all work as well as or better than what we worked on yesterday – because after all, it’s just VIDEO right?
But it’s not really “video” any more at all. It’s all just data. And data is growing and becoming more and more complex – and it’s harder and harder to manage – so these new tools are trying to allow us to do much, much more, with vastly more complex asset groups.
And it’s all a bit sticky that the moment.
All I can tell you is that after a year with X, I’ve learned hundreds of little things that have made most of the “pain points” recede for me. And I’m now editing faster and easier than I used to. But definitely NOT because I bought that particular brand of software.
It’s because like everything else in life, I’ve put in the time in the seat to figure out how to operate it efficiently.
That’s kinda where you appear to be.
It does get much, much better if you stick with it. Just not overnight.
But your observation:
[Diego Barraza] “but man, it is certainly no easy transition from FCP 7 to X.”
is probably even truer than you thought when you wrote it!
FWIW.
“Before speaking out ask yourself whether your words are true, whether they are respectful and whether they are needed in our civil discussions.”-Justice O’Connor
-
Jason Jenkins
June 21, 2012 at 6:59 pm[Diego Barraza] “recently got a new top of the range imac to start fiddling with FCP X. I am running it with 4GB Ram and a external 2TB Gtech Drive for media storage”
How did you get a top-of-the-range iMac with only 4GB of RAM? You need to get that up to at least 8GB; 16 is better. How is your storage connected?
Jason Jenkins
Flowmotion Media
Video production… with style!Check out my Mormon.org profile.
-
Steve Connor
June 21, 2012 at 7:03 pmFirstly you need more RAM, 8GB is the absolute minimum you need, more if you can afford it. 4GB will certainly give you some performance issues. Also do you have background rendering ON in preferences? If you do switch it off and render when you need to.
Also check what your playback preferences are, make sure it is set to “better performance”
How is your external drive connected? Also make sure that your project or event hasn’t been set to your internal drive by mistake.
Steve Connor
“The ripple command is just a workaround for not having a magnetic timelinel”
Adrenalin Television -
Eric Santiago
June 22, 2012 at 4:09 amThere was also topics where keeping it native as in not using Optimize footage to be a better workflow.
I wish I can do that but I work mostly with R3D > ProRes clips. -
Diego Barraza
June 22, 2012 at 8:50 amI can understand the premise that the more RAM the merrier, but then why FCP X spec sheet says “2GB RAM minimum and 4GB RAM recommended”?. I would say that is misleading advertisement on their behalf.
I can always buy more RAM, but in FCP 7 with 4GB of RAM you could easily crunch any HDV project with no problem.
The media is all sitting in a external Gtech Drive with FW800 connection.Thanks for your concern and advise.
filmmaking-editing-dop-dad
-
Diego Barraza
June 22, 2012 at 9:44 amSorry, I flagged solution to the post when I was trying to use the like button instead. My mistake, have not found solution yet.
filmmaking-editing-dop-dad
-
Eric Santiago
June 22, 2012 at 11:52 amDiego you will find that spec on most apps and they are at a min.
FW800 is also not viable as far as my experiences go with any HD and up Digital Video format.
That was fine for SD back in the day.
Do you have an eSATA option for that G-Tech?
I use a 1TB and 4TB GRAID eSATA to a MBP.
Formats such as ProRes422 runs pretty smooth thank to eSATA.
Even edit in 4K ProRes4444 but thats pushing it 🙂 -
Steve Connor
June 22, 2012 at 12:19 pm[Eric Santiago] “FW800 is also not viable as far as my experiences go with any HD and up Digital Video format.
That was fine for SD back in the day.”FW800 is fine for HDV, I’ve been using FW800 with XDCam EX edits and haven’t found any issues and that’s a higher data rate
Steve Connor
“The ripple command is just a workaround for not having a magnetic timelinel”
Adrenalin Television -
Diego Barraza
June 22, 2012 at 1:49 pmI have handled and edited a LOT of projects in HD-HDV and Pro res with 800FW and never had a problem with FCP 7 and bellow. I know that in today’s scene FW800 is a bit passe, but many editors out there and I can say that it has been tried and tested with successful results for many years. I would not say that my data bottleneck is in the transfer rate of FW800 in my case.
filmmaking-editing-dop-dad
-
Michael Garber
June 22, 2012 at 6:28 pmDiego, understood with your frustration, but it’s most likely the RAM. I’m running some 23.98 prores from an unpowered fw800 drive and it’s ok but can get a big sluggish. I made proxy files and it works great.
Not sure if this works with HDV (as FCP won’t make proxies of all codecs), but try making proxy files out of them. Select clips in viewer, right click, select transcode. See if you can choose proxy. I know, strange to make proxies from something that runs 3mb/s but try it and see (just a troubleshooting idea, not a definitive answer). You can switch back and forth between proxy in the preferences menu. Note – it’s global, so all projects play as proxy. Clips not proxy show up as offline.
One other thing – which video card is in your system? Is it the version with 512mb of ram or 1GB version? I had a 512mb card before I upgraded on my mac pro and it helped greatly.
If you up the ram, I recommend 16gb and it’s not that much $ from OWC. (It’s probably the RAM
)Trash the prefs. Do a permissions fix, bla bla bla. Hope that helps. Let us know what you do.
Michael Garber
5th Wall – a post production company
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up