Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy STOP MOTION ANIMATION

  • STOP MOTION ANIMATION

    Posted by Allen Freiler on November 21, 2007 at 12:45 am

    Hey, I want to start a stop motion project by just using a digital camera and was wondering what the best ratio would be for the pictures i would be taking so that when i put them into final cut, they dont come out pixelated. Or would it just be easier to use a videocamera and tape 5 secs of the image and just use 1 frame out of that 5 secs?

    David Bogie replied 18 years, 8 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    November 21, 2007 at 4:44 am

    [Allen Freiler] “what the best ratio would be for the pictures i would be taking so that when i put them into final cut, they dont come out pixelated.”

    What do you mean by this? DIMENSIONS? Like 720×486 or 1920×1080?

    Shane


    Littlefrog Post

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD now for sale!
    http://www.lfhd.net

  • Allen Freiler

    November 21, 2007 at 5:45 am

    yes. dimensions. what would be the setting i would need to set my camera to in order for the dimensions not to come out pixelated when i put it all together in FCP.

  • David Bogie

    November 21, 2007 at 4:57 pm

    What do you mean by pixelated?
    If you scale them up, you will make the pixels bigger and this usually makes them more noticeable. But if you have to scale down every frame, you are wasting tremendous amounts of processing time. Shoot at exactly the pixel dimensions you want to use in the final presentation format. Most DV cameras have a still image mode, use that if you can’t use a digital SLR.

    But if you are talking about the traditional use of the term pixelation in stop frame animation, your ratio of still images to running time should not be any greater that 20 to 1. You can get away with 15 frames of animation for 30 frames of screen time, what we call “on-twos” but you really can’t take that down to “on-threes” unless you are ware of the stylistic impact such economies impart on the finished product.

    Like an idiot, I’ve posted answers to both of your posts.

    bogiesan

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy