-
Standard Candle v8.0
-
https://www.yousendit.com/download/cnJqYkJwYUliR0x2Wmc9PQ
Expires 27thDaVinci Resolve 8.0, FCS3, FCPX
MacPro5,1, 2×2.93 32GB, Software Raid
ATI Radeon HD 5770/NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Multibridge Extreme, Tangent Wave -
Cool! Thanks.
NEHALEM OCTO 2,26
GT 120
GTX 285
8 Giga RAM
SOFT RAID 8 Tera
Wave
Eizo 243 + Hdlink displayport
DAV, COLOR, FINAL CUT AND MEDIA COMP -
My results:
V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
V3 6 nodes : 17 fps
V4 12 nodes : 9 fps
V5 : 24 fps
V6 : 14 fps
V7 : 7 fps
V8 : 2 fpsNEHALEM OCTO 2,26
GT 120
GTX 285
8 Giga RAM
SOFT RAID 8 Tera
Wave
Eizo 243 + Hdlink displayport
DAV, COLOR, FINAL CUT AND MEDIA COMP -
And here the results for a single card Quadro 4000 setup :
V1 2 nodes : 23 fps
V2 4 nodes : 14 fps
V3 6 nodes : 10 fps
V4 12 nodes : 5 fps
V5 NR 4/30 : 15 fps
V6 NR 3/30 : 10 fps
V7 NR 2/30 : 5 fps
V8 NR 1/30 : 1 fpsI think that answers the question if a single Quadro 4000 is usable , or not 🙂
A slice of color…
DaVinci 7.1.2 OSX 10.6.7
MacPro 5.1 2x 2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
And here are results from a Dual Cubix powered Quadro 4000 system with GT120 as UI.
V1 2 nodes : 23 fps
V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
V3 6 nodes : 24 fps
V4 12 nodes: 12 fps
V5 NR 4/30 : 24 fps
V6 NR 3/30 : 24 fps
V7 NR 2/30 : 12 fps
V8 NR 1/30 : 4 fpsThats good to work with I think, but its also just 5% faster than Blase’s GTX 470 tests it seems.
For 10 times the money…uhhhh…A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.0.1b3 OSX 10.6.8
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
[Sascha Haber] “And here are results from a Dual Cubix powered Quadro 4000 system with GT120 as UI.”
Is that a desktop 4 Cubix? Those scores are a little better than my setup with the same cards in a desktop 2.
-
Guys, please check with DaVinci when comparing various configurations, including comparisons between GPU-xpander Desktop 2 and Desktop 4 systems. There are data transfer speed differences between these two products which may affect performance when working with Resolve 8 in multi-GPU configurations.
Eric Fiegehen
Cubix -
Yes, it was a Cubix Desktop 4 with two Quadro 4000s and a Rocket which was not active at this time.
So far all benchmarks show its all about CUDA cores.
It would be interesting to see multiple high power cards in external chassis systems now.
And I wonder if we would see a 5xx card for the Mac.
A lot of people feel left out those days.
I am not fan of the Hackintosh, but my clients seem to like the noise reduction and that basically eats up the performance available without even touching the rest of the tools.A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.0.1b3 OSX 10.6.8
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
The performance in a Desktop 4 should be better than Desktop 2 as you get full x16 link to the GPUs.
For new purchases, we recommend the Desktop 4 for this reason and the fact that it allows you to use double-wide GPUs without losing any slots.
-
Are there 2 of these threads? I think I posted in the wrong one. These are my results with the test project from THIS thread;
After setting the playback speed to 100fps to get a better overview for the lower nodes;
“2 nodes” – 61fps
“4 nodes” – 40fps
“6 nodes” – 29fps
“12 nodes” – 16fps“NR4” – 48fps
“NR3” – 32fps
“NR2” – 16fps
“NR1” – 5fpsThis is on a Hackintosh with Nvidia GTX (OC) 480 for GUI, GTX 285 for GUI, Decklink HD Extreme 3D, i7@3.8GHz on X58 mobo with 6GB RAM and reading media from a 4 drive RAID0 that has 540MB/s I/O.
With this test I get 24 fps with 7 nodes which I am more than happy with, anything over 7 nodes and I’ll use the render caching.
Can’t wait to see single GTX 580 results if anyone gets that working!
Future system will be Dual-GPU (hopefully dual 580 on LGA2011 board).
All we need now is better processing for cheap real-time half-red RED debayering! I’m getting a 6-core soon and hoping to go to 4.2 GHz which might get me close! Will keep you guys posted.
p.s. LOVING 8.01 (-:
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up