-
Standard Candle v8.0
Hi there,
back to benchmarking I say !
I refined the project so it contains predefined versions to test and play around with. Again, import the project, relink the clip from the installer and you should be good to go. Change the version number in pause mode, press play and watch the performance.Version 1-4 contain grading nodes with soft windows and blur/sharpening.
Version 5-8 do only noise reduction on levels 4-1.Here is the link : https://www.yousendit.com/download/MFo1Z284ckkwMEd4dnc9PQ
Valid until 17th of JulyHere are my results :
V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
V3 6 nodes : 17 fps
V4 12 nodes : 9 fps
V5 NR 4 : 24 fps
V6 NR 4 : 14 fps
V7 NR 4 : 7 fps
V8 NR 4 : 2 fpsA slice of color…
DaVinci 7.1.2 OSX 10.6.7
MacPro 5.1 2x 2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
34 Replies
-
I pretty much have the exact same system, and those are pretty much the results I get.
The big thing just seems to be the amount of CUDA cores. Which frustrates me because…
Gtx285 – 240 cuda cores – ~400 bux
Quadro 4000 – 256 cuda – ~850 bux
Gtx 590 (not compatible with macs) 1024 Cuda cores – 700 buxNot that I’m bitter.
Seriously though, it’s sad that hackintoshes are the cheapest way to get the best performance. But with my recent positive experiences with windows 7 and cs5.5… I’m starting to hope for windows version of resolve…
Joseph Mastantuono
Online Editor – Colorist – Post Consultant
Brooklyn based finishing at reasonable prices
917.969.1583 -
The question is, how many cores per card are supported by Resolve and by OSX.
I am hoping for some Hackintosh friends and patched 460 cards to share results too.
I have a suspicion its not only cores that matter.A slice of color…
DaVinci 7.1.2 OSX 10.6.7
MacPro 5.1 2x 2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
Hi Sascha,
My results:
V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
V3 6 nodes : 24 fps
V4 12 nodes :24 fps
V4-x2 24 nodes: 14fps
V5 NR 4 : 24 fps
V6 NR 4 : 24 fps
V7 NR 4 : 24 fps
V8 NR 4 : 7 fpsMy hack… i7 980x, Ati5770 for monitors, gtx480+gtx470 for cuda. 10.6.7
saludos,
Jose.
-
Holy jumping…wow…
Now thats impressing I say.
So in other other words, its like 4 times as the standard configuration.A slice of color…
DaVinci 7.1.2 OSX 10.6.7
MacPro 5.1 2x 2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
I have a macpro 12 cores too, but I prefer to use this config because the performance is a lot better than macpro… some headaches in the installation, but when all is working ok, its like a macpro.
I recommend a room for the computer if you always use NR, because the graphics card are noisier and hotter.
-
2011 Mac pro 8 core
6 Gb ram
GTX470 (operating at 2.5gts, haven’t flashed to 5.0 yet.)
(no 2nd gfx card)
slot 1 – gtx470
slot2 – atto R380 raid
slot3 – DL 3d output
slot4 – RedrocketV1 – 24
V2 – 24
V3 – 17
V4 – 10
V5- 24
V6 – 18
V7- 10
V8 – 3 -
2011 Mac Pro 12-Core (2.66)
ATI 5770 GUI
Cubix Desktop Pro 2 w/2x Quadro 4000
Decklink Extreme 3D+
ATTO FC41ES connected to Terrablock 24DV1 – 24
V2 – 24
V3 – 22
V4 – 12
V5 – 24
V6 – 21.5
V7 – 11
V8 – 3EDIT: For fun I put the GTX285 from our second system in the Cubix along with the 2 Quadro 4000s for 3 GPUs total (if mismatched).
V1 – 24
V2 – 24
V3 – 24
V4 – 18
V5 – 24
V6 – 24
V7 – 16
V8 – 4 -
That looks like my future configuration then.
Your patched 470 performs like a Dual 4000 Cubix it seems, well done 🙂A slice of color…
DaVinci 7.1.2 OSX 10.6.7
MacPro 5.1 2x 2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB eSata 6TB
GTX 285 / GT 120
Extreme 3D+ WAVE -
24
16 🙁
11 🙁
6 🙁
17 🙁
11 🙁
5 🙁
1 🙁
That’s one Q4000 for ya!
Interesting to know there are alternatives to cubix.DaVinci Resolve 8.0, FCS3, FCPX
MacPro5,1, 2×2.93 32GB, Software Raid
ATI Radeon HD 5770/NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Multibridge Extreme, Tangent Wave -
[Ian de Brí] “That’s one Q4000 for ya!
Interesting to know there are alternatives to cubix.”I’m pretty disappointed in the Quadro 4000 especially for the price. I am tempted to get two GTX470s for the Cubix and see what happens.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up