-
Square Pixel projects for web use, best workflow??
Hi,
i am regularly doing clips lately that just get used for the web. Source Material is mostly DV, so up to now I used to work in a DV-PAL Sequence Setting and then compressed my finished Clip using compressor, Streamclip etc. to get into the final square pixel setting without fields for web delivery.
Since I was pretty disappointed of the results regarding the de-interlaced final clips (especially on titles and graphics with jagged edges from the de-interlacing) I wondered which workflow delivers best quality here?
If I mix DV-Material and After Effects Titles and Animations and know I will deliver in 640×360 pixels, is it more effective to work in a 640×360 squarepixel sequence in Final Cut and Deinterlace the Video and render animations in progressive square pixels??
Which Codec is then best to use? I went nuts about the render times that haunted me in this workflow.
I basically threw my DV material into a 640×360 sequence with square pixels, de-interlaced it and exported it to a Quicktime with DV Compression. That already took some time, now on importing and placing the rendered clip back in the sequence settings I exported it from I got a red bar and had to render it again in FCP to get playback…
Which Codec would you use when setting up a sequence with the settings above and is the DV-Codec the problem with progressive square pixels or why can’t FCP playback a rendered, exported and re-imported clip in real time with matching sequence settings??Which workflow would you use to avoid jaggy edges in titles and graphics from the De-Interlacing of DV encoded material??
Karim
-Karim-