Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Square Pixel projects for web use, best workflow??

  • Square Pixel projects for web use, best workflow??

    Posted by Karim Daire on March 19, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    Hi,

    i am regularly doing clips lately that just get used for the web. Source Material is mostly DV, so up to now I used to work in a DV-PAL Sequence Setting and then compressed my finished Clip using compressor, Streamclip etc. to get into the final square pixel setting without fields for web delivery.

    Since I was pretty disappointed of the results regarding the de-interlaced final clips (especially on titles and graphics with jagged edges from the de-interlacing) I wondered which workflow delivers best quality here?

    If I mix DV-Material and After Effects Titles and Animations and know I will deliver in 640×360 pixels, is it more effective to work in a 640×360 squarepixel sequence in Final Cut and Deinterlace the Video and render animations in progressive square pixels??

    Which Codec is then best to use? I went nuts about the render times that haunted me in this workflow.
    I basically threw my DV material into a 640×360 sequence with square pixels, de-interlaced it and exported it to a Quicktime with DV Compression. That already took some time, now on importing and placing the rendered clip back in the sequence settings I exported it from I got a red bar and had to render it again in FCP to get playback…
    Which Codec would you use when setting up a sequence with the settings above and is the DV-Codec the problem with progressive square pixels or why can’t FCP playback a rendered, exported and re-imported clip in real time with matching sequence settings??

    Which workflow would you use to avoid jaggy edges in titles and graphics from the De-Interlacing of DV encoded material??

    Karim

    -Karim-

    Rafael Amador replied 17 years, 1 month ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Rafael Amador

    March 20, 2009 at 1:38 am

    Hi Karim,
    Your workflow is OK.
    Just few little things:
    – You need to set your 640×360 sequence with field dominance: NONE.
    – Export your AE graphics as Progressive. No point to make them interlaced if they have to be de-interlaced.
    Edit in the codec you want but before rendering:
    – Set your sequence to ProRess.
    – Set “Render all YUV in High Precision”.
    – Set “Render Motion Effects: Best”.
    Export your ProRess 640×360-Progressive-Square pixels QT movie. If you are happy with it you only need to compress it for the web.
    BTW, use a good de-interlacer. Nattress is the only one that works in 10b in FC.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

    (and here some clips for the friends: https://www.vimeo.com/2694745 )

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy