-
Sony Vegas Preview Lag
Posted by Michael Pece on March 4, 2012 at 3:09 amUsing Sony Vegas Pro 11.
When previewing a clip in the preview window that has no effects, it runs at 30FPS+, but if that clip has effects, i.e. is crossfading with another clip, when the preview reaches that point it drops to below 1FPS until the effect is over.
I have tried ALL preview modes.
I’m on Windows 7. 4GB ram, 3.06 GHz intel core 2 duo processor.
What can fix this?
P.S. I know about the render preview thing.
Mike Kujbida replied 14 years, 2 months ago 3 Members · 13 Replies -
13 Replies
-
John Bean
March 4, 2012 at 4:29 amMore RAM, a QUAD Core CPU, and an OpenCL capable GPU video graphics card that has lots of RAM!
OR …
Have faith that Vegas will do what you want it to do.
If you want re-assurance, then just rendered out a test of the desired region in your project. You don’t need to render out all of your project. If you keep your selected region to a few seconds, the render shouldn’t be too long.
As well, if your source media files uses a video codec that is very CPU intensive to decode, you should re-encode it to some more expedient video codec that Vegas can more easily work with if you want better quality real-time preview.
For example, AVCHD (H264) is a highly compressed codec that requires a lot of CPU work to decode. But if you re-encode to some intermediate codec that is less compressed, it will give Vegas more time to focus on transitions and effects instead of decoding.
-
Michael Pece
March 4, 2012 at 4:50 amThe files are wmv format. Also, when it’s playing that part of the clip, the RAM is only using about 1GB, so I don’t think it’s that. So it’s the processor or graphics card?
-
John Bean
March 4, 2012 at 8:53 amUpgrading your computer will improve things, but if you have a lot effects and transitions, it is still going to be very poor preview.
It is still just a PREVIEW window!
You can step through your timeline manually (using mouse and keyboard) to see how each frame looks in the PREVIEW window. But even still, with a lot effects and transitions, the PREVIEW is still just a PREVIEW and will still be quite different from what the actual rendered-as output will be.
So for very intense sections of your project, you will need to render it out if you want to see a more accurate view.
-
Mike Kujbida
March 4, 2012 at 12:51 pm[Michael Pece] “The files are wmv format.”
A core 2 duo is not the fastest computer around and WMV is a mastering format, not an editing format which helps explain why it’s so sluggish.
Out of curiosity, why WMV and not an easier format to edit? -
Michael Pece
March 4, 2012 at 4:28 pmMy clips are from Call of Duty, and they are captured in some weird format, and my HD PVR comes with a converter that converts them to wmv. What would be a better format?
-
Michael Pece
March 4, 2012 at 4:51 pmOh wow, turns out it WAS caused by wmv! So much stress. THANKS MICROSOFT ¬_¬
Thanks for your help guys!
P.S. My converter has the option to convert to MP4, and that works fine =)
-
Mike Kujbida
March 4, 2012 at 6:20 pmWhat other options do you have as far as video formats are concerned?
-
Michael Pece
March 4, 2012 at 6:22 pmThe converter can convert to .MOV format.
I am going to try and render a .wmv clip as .avi, then re-render that as a .wmv again to see if .avi has the problem too.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up