Activity › Forums › Sony Cameras › Sony F-3 fits where?
-
Sony F-3 fits where?
Posted by Steve Wargo on November 12, 2010 at 11:31 pmWhich forum will this fit on?
https://www.studiodaily.com/main/news/prc/12704.html
Steve Wargo
Tempe, Arizona
It’s a dry heat!Sony HDCAM F-900 & HDW-2000/1 deck
5 Final Cut (not quite PRO) systems
Sony HVR-M25 HDV deck
2-Sony EX-1 HD .Ask me how to Market Yourself using Send Out Cards
Rafael Amador replied 15 years, 9 months ago 6 Members · 8 Replies -
8 Replies
-
Michael Palmer
November 12, 2010 at 11:34 pmThe F is really a part of the EX digital file family, so perhaps here.
Good Luck
Michael Palmer -
Craig Seeman
November 12, 2010 at 11:51 pmCan you imagine paying that price for a camera that records to heavily compressed 4:2:0?!!! One might say it includes a proxy format encoder while one waits until next year for Sony to include the Dual Link support. Otherwise it’s a candidate for the AJA KiProMini for Apple ProRes.
It’s really strange calling it a hand held camera too.
-
Michael Palmer
November 13, 2010 at 12:34 amI wonder why the F didn’t get the 50Mbps 4:2:2 codec, or will it when it finally ships. The SR digital file system will be an interesting new development. However it won’t be long before someone offers up a completely uncompressed digital recorder at an affordable price to use with these new indie cameras.
Good Luck
Michael Palmer -
Michael Palmer
November 13, 2010 at 12:44 amOh and what were they thinking with that ridiculous looking viewfinder on the back of the camera. It has the same hand grip with zoom control as the EX3 so there must be a zoom lens on the way.
Good Luck
Michael Palmer -
Noah Kadner
November 13, 2010 at 12:52 amYup and it’s PL mount only with an adapter. In other words same price as a RED but much worse codec and not a native PL mount. Yet people will buy much more of these just because it’s Sony- the trusted brand. And they know this…
Noah
Unlock the secrets of 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio with Call Box Training. Featuring the Canon 5D Mark II and 7D.
-
Craig Seeman
November 13, 2010 at 1:33 amI’ve generally been saying all this to others as well.
I think the F3 is camera placed right in the middle of no current market.
Way too expensive to compete with AF100
Not enough features to compete with REDI see it selling to F35 broadcast productions that don’t want to get additional F35 . . . when Dual Link actually comes out.
It’s just the wrong price point and wrong set of features to get beyond that. I’m not sure if “trusted” is the best selling point in a world of shrinking budgets . . . except it’s a lot less expensive than an F35.
-
Steve Connor
November 13, 2010 at 10:06 amI think it’s very hard to comment until we see pictures from it.
Steve Connor
Adrenalin TelevisionHave you tried “Search Posts”? Enlightenment may be there.
-
Rafael Amador
November 13, 2010 at 10:51 amThis is another example of how out of tune with users the manufacturers are.
However, this camera has an advantage over the PANA: This one output 10b Unc through the SDI, while the PANA is just 8b.
In the other hand I wouldn’t compare it with the RED. This still being a camcorder and can be managed for just one guy. The RED needs a team behind.
rafael
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up