Someone give me quaintifiable evidence of FCPX market penetration. Features. Industrials. Commercials. Weddings. Where?

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “Get a grip fellas. NDA’s do not apply to corporations. Corporation set the terms of NDA’s. If you think that Apple or Warner Brothers are constrained by any NDA the you are deluded.”

Whether they are or aren’t, there is no way that WB wants the conversation about a big budget movie that they haven’t even started the campaign for, to be started by the company that makes the editing software they used. And I’m pretty sure Apple isn’t going to piss of WB for the sake of a bunch of curious people on the internet.

We know they used FCP X. We know the editorial team had a good experience. Not perfect, but good enough that they’d happily do it again. The details will appear when the movie does.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

[Charlie Austin] “there is no way that WB want’s the conversation a”

So you speak for Warner Brothers?

Tim

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “So you speak for Warner Brothers?”

No Tim, I don’t. But what I do, is movie marketing. I work with the marketing dept’s of movie studios. I know how the process works.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

Yes, I hear this all the time. No one (certainly not the top posters) have characterized anyone who might have a problem (any problem) with FCPX as people who are are to old/stupid/set in in their ways to not understand what FCPX has to offer.

Tim

[Timothy Auld]

And what does that mean? At the core: does the corporation with more money set the agenda? Or am I wrong about that?

Tim

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “No one (certainly not the top posters) have characterized anyone who might have a problem (any problem) with FCPX as people who are are to old/stupid/set in in their ways to not understand what FCPX has to offer.
“

Comments from 2 or 3 people are not representative of all “top posters”.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

So not “two or three people” as you say.

Tim

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “And what does that mean? At the core: does the corporation with more money set the agenda? Or am I wrong about that?”

It has nothing to do with that. WB has a movie. They spent a ton of money on it. They want to control the conversation about it as much as they can. Even people who worked on it can’t mention it by name yet. Apple is, in some ways, in the same business. They will talk about it when WB says it’s OK for them to do so.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Anders Utterstrom]

Funny Post! I was just talking about the tools with a fiend that we can use today, compared just a few years ago. I like FCP X. It’s like my Audi is better than your BMW. Ciao!

Anders Utterstrom
Chicago, Illinois

[Timothy Auld]

If you are trying to tell me that the corporation with more money trumps the corporation with less money then I think I many not agree with you.

Tim