Someone give me quaintifiable evidence of FCPX market penetration. Features. Industrials. Commercials. Weddings. Where?

[Timothy Auld]

‘Warner Bros. probably does not want Apple to talk about their movie yet.’ Sorry, but “qoute” wasn’t working.

Warner Brothers is but a fly on the windshield compared to Apple. To suggest that Warner Brothers controls this conversation is delusional.

Tim

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “Warner Brothers is but a fly on the windshield compared to Apple. To suggest that Warner Brothers controls this conversation is delusional.”

All due respect, but you have no clue how movie marketing works. There are NDA’s involved. Believe whatever you want though…

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Andrew Kimery]

[Charlie Austin] “Warner Bros. probably does not want Apple to talk about their movie yet. They don’t even have a full trailer out at this point, just a teaser. The marketing campaign won’t even get going until after the new year. Why would they let Apple start talking about their film before they do? That was rhetorical by the way. They wouldn’t.
“

This would be my guess too. Everyone is probably under insane NDAs until the movie is released. I know some editors that, due to NDA, could not say what project they were working on even though you can look them up on IMDB and see exactly what they are working on.

All the PPro articles about its use on Gone Girl didn’t appear until around the same time the movie hit theaters, right?

[Charlie Austin]

[Andrew Kimery] “All the PPro articles about its use on Gone Girl didn’t appear until around the same time the movie hit theaters, right?”

Correct.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

Really? I don’t? OK.

Tim

[Charlie Austin]

[TImothy Auld] “Really? I don’t? OK.
“

Sorry for the tone, But seriously, the relative size of a company makes no difference when it comes to the control of their intellectual property.

————————————————————-

~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

[Timothy Auld]

Get a grip fellas. NDA’s do not apply to corporations. Corporation set the terms of NDA’s. If you think that Apple or Warner Brothers are constrained by any NDA the you are deluded.

Tim

[Scott Witthaus]

I don’t understand what Tim is even asking for. Where the hell are you going to get “quantifiable” evidence for these things for ANY software. The “quantifiable” data is the amount of downloads? Nothing to see here. Move along.

Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter

[Timothy Auld]

If you don’t understand it then you can’t supply it.

Tim

[Jeremy Garchow]

[TImothy Auld] “Please, Jeremy.”

I frequent this forum often, but I can’t quite remember if anyone said that X is taking over. So, if you don’t mind, I’d like to frame this discussion appropriately. That’s all.

People seem to want proof that X is being used in the workplace (being used is much different than “taking over”) and when it’s provided, it is immediately rejected.