Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Slow Performance on GTX 285 (GUI) + GTX 580 3gb Combo (Cubix)

  • Slow Performance on GTX 285 (GUI) + GTX 580 3gb Combo (Cubix)

    Posted by Chris Hall on June 26, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    Hey guys, wasn’t sure whether to post this here or the new configuration forum, so I’ll start here til someone yells at me 🙂

    I just upgraded a MAC system from a GT120+GTX285+GTX285 configuration (using cubix expander), to a GTX285(GUI)+GTX580(EVGA PC Version, nonflashed 3gb) combo. My standard candle tests actually ended up dropping with a single 580 compared to 2×285’s. I’m not sure why, and hoping someone might have an insight here.

    Old System:
    MacPro 8core 2.26 Nehalem 24gb RAM (OSX 10.6.8)
    Slot 1 – GT120
    Slot 2 – cubix
    Slot 3 – Decklink 3D
    Slot 4 – RocketRaid 4322
    Cubix 1 – GTX285 (1gb VRAM)
    Cubix 2 – GTX285 (1gb VRAM)
    Cubix 3 – Red Rocket
    Cubix 4 – Empty

    New System:
    MacPro 8 core 2.26 Nehalem 24gb RAM (OSX 10.7.4, AGPM kext removed)
    Slot 1 – GTX285
    Slot 2 – cubix
    Slot 3 – Decklink 3D
    Slot 4 – RocketRaid 4322
    Cubix 1 – GTX580 (3gb VRAM, PC Version, non-flashed)
    Cubix 2 – Empty
    Cubix 3 – Red Rocket
    Cubix 4 – Empty

    Candle Tests:
    GT120+2xGTX285 System
    V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
    V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
    V3 6 nodes : 24 fps
    V4 12 nodes : 19.5 fps (9 Nodes in Realtime)
    V5 NR 4 : 24 fps
    V6 NR 3 : 24 fps
    V7 NR 2 : 15 fps
    V8 NR 1 : 4.5 fps

    GTX285+GTX580 System
    V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
    V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
    V3 6 nodes : 24 fps
    V4 12 nodes : 16.5 fps (8 Nodes in Realtime)
    V5 NR 4 : 24 fps
    V6 NR 3 : 24 fps
    V7 NR 2 : 14 fps
    V8 NR 1 : 4 fps

    Any ideas here? I’m stumped. I suppose I just need to add another GTX580 for better performance. I just assumed 1×580 would be better than 2xGTX285’s (and I gained the 3gb ram as well). Should I give David Pirinelli a call and have it flashed maybe? Thanks all.

    Chris Hall
    Colorist – Basher Films
    Pasadena, CA

    Chris Hall replied 13 years, 10 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Rohit Gupta

    June 26, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    This looks correct to me. 1 580 = 2 x 285 approx.

    Just get another 580 and you’ll have double the performance.

  • Chris Hall

    June 27, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    Yeah, I guess I had just expected having 512 cuda cores (in the 580) would lead to faster performance than the total 480 in the 2xGTX285’s right? I guess in this case, two slower cards are better than 1?

    Chris Hall
    Colorist – Basher Films
    Pasadena, CA

  • Juan Salvo

    June 27, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    There is an archecture difference between the two cards (actually two architecture revisions between them) and just as the gtx680 with 3x the number of cores as a 580 doesn’t perform 3x faster, the core to performance relationship is not a linear one.

    Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author

    https://JuanSalvo.com

  • Chris Hall

    June 27, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    copy that, thanks guys appreciate the insight. Another 580 it is.

    Chris Hall
    Colorist – Basher Films
    Pasadena, CA

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy