Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Should I update Quicktime?

  • Should I update Quicktime?

    Posted by Quinn Costello on August 3, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Hi All-

    I’m finishing a project and (of course) now my rendering time is extraordinarily slow. I’m thinking that it might have something to do with the version of FCP and Quicktime I’m using. I’m loathe to do any major updates when I’m so close to completion but this processing time is really slowing my down. I know it’s not the drive because it runs fine on our other older system processing HD material but with an earlier OS and FCP version. The project I’m currently having trouble with is standard def AJA Kona LH: 525 29.97 DVCPro50.

    I’m running FCP 6.0.5 with Quicktime 7.6 on a dual processor 2.66 GHz Intel Xeon. I also have 5 gigs of RAM and an Aja Kona LHe card.

    So whadya think? Should I update or slog on through.

    Quinn

    Craig Sawchuk replied 16 years, 9 months ago 4 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    August 3, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    Nope…it isn’t your version of QT. QT updates don’t affect render times, and the version you have is perfectly suited for the OS and FCP versions you are running.

    Render times can be related to a lot of things, including the effects you are rendering, what graphics card you have, and the speed of your processors. Many filters are FXPlug plugins, and they rely on the graphics card. The better the card, the faster the render times.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Chris Borjis

    August 3, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    never upgrade quicktime unless you have a really compelling reason.

    it could very well introduce more problems.

  • Quinn Costello

    August 3, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Thanks for the advice. I have the NVIDIA GeForce 7300GT in this system. I was under the impression that was a pretty good card. Is that not the case?

    Thanks,
    Quinn

  • Shane Ross

    August 3, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    That’s a good card. But again, it also depends on the effects that you are rendering. Some take longer than others.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Quinn Costello

    August 3, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    Mostly it’s just simple moves on stills. Some of the stills were very large pict files (in excess of 20 mbs) and I’m replacing them with smaller 1 mb jpegs. That is certainly preventing me from crashing but not helping much with the render time.

  • Craig Sawchuk

    August 4, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Still images seem to suck the life out of Final Cut. A number of people have advocated using Motion as a better tool to handle the “Ken Burnsy” stuff…

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy