Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Cinematography shot with a camcorder vs. shot with a film camera

  • shot with a camcorder vs. shot with a film camera

    Posted by Clyde Villegas on February 27, 2011 at 12:59 am

    Footages shot with video cameras look videoey when compressed to DVD. Movies shot with film cameras still look like movies shot with film cameras when compressed to DVD (I bet even when compressed to DV format as well). The rich dynamic range of the colors is still there. What causes this?

    ut in omnibus glorificetur Deus

    Richard Herd replied 15 years, 4 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Mark Suszko

    February 28, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    This premise of yours is no longer universally true.

  • Clyde Villegas

    February 28, 2011 at 11:08 pm

    Thanks, Mark, but I’m talking about old cameras like the XL1, XL2, DVX100B that uses DV compression, not DSLRS shooting HD and compressed in AVCHD format.

    ut in omnibus glorificetur Deus

  • Richard Herd

    March 3, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    Film of course must be scanned before it can be video (regardless of codec).

    It’s important to keep in mind the difference between a photosite (like on a 3-chip camera or cmos) and a pixel.

    Scanning film means the resolution itself in the scan is of a higher pixel resolution (ppi) than the best digital video camera has photosites.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy