Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Panasonic Cameras shot 24fps-want slomo

  • shot 24fps-want slomo

    Posted by David Fox on April 22, 2007 at 1:48 am

    Hi,

    We have shot a project on a Varicam in 24 that is all fine. there are a couple of shots that would be swell in slomo if we could input that footage at 60fps. We have a 1200a deck and have been digitzing native DVCpro HD through FW, but we do also have a Kona3 card. Any suggestions?

    Thanks,
    David

    Gary Adcock replied 19 years ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Andrew J. cifelli

    April 26, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Looking for best results shooting with Varicam time-lapse.
    How many frames and how often?

  • Gary Adcock

    April 26, 2007 at 4:25 pm

    [rock- paper -scissors- shoot!] “Looking for best results shooting with Varicam time-lapse. How many frames and how often?”

    the varicam can only do 10 frame bursts, with the external Hardware FRC you can get down to one frame.

    John or C.R may have a better answer.

    gary adcock
    Studio37
    HD & Film Consultation
    Post and Production Workflows

  • John Sharaf

    April 26, 2007 at 6:15 pm

    Rock,

    There is no one answer to your question; the proper interval rate is determined by two factors, the ultimate length of the shot you want to create and the period of the action you wish to compress.

    For example if you wanted to show a building being built that will take six months (180 days) and you want the shot to last one minute, you’d take one burst of ten frames (the minimum) every three days (presumably at the same time of day so you wouldn’t have to change the exposure).

    On the other hand if the action is shorter, say for example, the sun traversing across the cityscape, where the action might take six hours (you begin six hours before sunset) and you want the shot to last 30 seconds (30×60 frames per second) it would be five bursts of ten frames each minute.

    One thing to remember is that this type of photography really beats up your camera; the heads are spinning constantly and each burst of recording requires an insert edit where the deck backspaces, and you’ll have a post production chore creating a sequence by pulling one frame from each burst of ten,

    I think a more common method these days of accomplishing HD timelapse is with a high quality difital still camera; some of which like the Canon’s have an intervalomenter accessorie. This methos is in many cases more appropriate than leaving $60000 camera mounted and unattended over a long period. Also when long shutter speeds are required, such as doing an interval recording of stars at night, this becomes the only method to do so.

    JS

  • Gary Adcock

    April 26, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    thanks john

    I knew you had more options that I could think of off the top of my head,

    I find the P2 cameras interval recording to be simpler to use since it actually can record a single frame at a time.

    gary adcock
    Studio37
    HD & Film Consultation
    Post and Production Workflows

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy