Hmm, well that’s going to be a little bit of a tough one.
Since your viewfinder is basically lying to you (well, maybe not lying, but is so forgiving that the image looks good when it really isn’t), I’m not sure there is any way around that other than doing at least your initial setup with a larger production monitor on location. Is that just physically impossible?
While a clearscan camera can fix the problem easily, the problem is of course knowing exactly what the shutter speed (in Hz) should be. Since you’ve been told this system is 50 Hz, and considering you are in the US, that leads me to believe it is battery powered or DC-converted using some independent system… separate from “mains” power. Ergo, we don’t know what the heck the actual precise Hz shutter speed should be. They may tell you it’s 50 Hz, but as I’m sure you know it is highly unlikely to be exactly 50… it’s probably something like 50.023 or 49.985 or some other seemingly random number… but one that you must hit on exactly to completely eliminate the strobing.
I just can’t think of a single way to set this up with known accuracy without having a truthful monitor, at least for the initial setup.
Also, not to stir the pot further, but there might be multiple frequencies going on there. I was shooting a location once that had several hundred decorated Christmas trees… all with LED lighting. Because multiple generators were being used to power these, not all of the trees could be shutter-synced at once. I could dial in a precise shutter speed for one section of trees, and another section would strobe… and vice versa. Maybe not, but you might run across this same phenomenon with your aircraft lighting. In that case you’d need a truthful monitor not only for the initial setup, but for all shots.
Anyone else have a better (or smarter) solution?
T2
__________________________________
Todd Terry
Creative Director
Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
fantasticplastic.com
