Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Scanning/shooting paintings

  • Scanning/shooting paintings

    Posted by Toobit on March 13, 2008 at 1:56 am

    I’ve been asked to bid on a project that would consist of visuals from 12 paintings. It is an illustrated book and the whole audio track will be about 20 minutes long. So, given that we only have 12 paintings for those 20 minutes, we would need to show “details” of the paintings. Lot’s of zoom-ins and close detail cutaways. Think “Reading Rainbow”!!

    I get how to do this, but I am wondering what resolution these photos would have to be. I will be editing at 1920×1080, so I typically would have the photos done at 6x the resolution, which would make this HUGE:

    So, I have two options:

    -require the client to give me the paintings as .TIF’s at 6x 1920×1080

    or

    -arrange to go and shoot the paintings myself. This way, I could shoot the photos large, but could also shoot close-ups of the detailed areas I know I’ll need.

    Any advice or gotchas I need to know about?

    thanks
    -Tucker

    also, I read about a plug-in for Final Cut that let’s you do the “Ken Burns” easier, by just drawing bounding boxes. Anyone know what that is called?

    Toobit replied 18 years, 1 month ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Rennie Klymyk

    March 13, 2008 at 6:11 am

    How big are the paintings?

    “everything is broken” ……Bob Dylan

  • Jóhannes Tryggvason

    March 13, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    If you shoot the paintings yourself you also have the added dimension of being able to shoot at an angle, and rack focus between places of interest.
    Back when I was a news cameraman I would sometimes shoot segments on exhibitions at art galleries and then I tried to always get one good wide shot of each painting, a few good closeups of interesting details and then I tried to shoot at angle because then you can really see the three-dimensionality of the brushstrokes.
    If I were you I´d try to get every conceiveable and unconceiveable angle because having to show a single painting for 100 seconds will quickly get boring. If the enviorenment relates to your subject matter then some shots of the surroundings would also help…

  • Chuck Reti

    March 13, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    [Tucker Dansie] “also, I read about a plug-in for Final Cut that let’s you do the “Ken Burns” easier, by just drawing bounding boxes. Anyone know what that is called?”

    Moving Picture from Stage Tools

    Pan Zoom Pro from Lyric

    among others.

  • Toobit

    March 15, 2008 at 3:18 am

    Thanks. This is a great idea. I agree completely. The stills will have some “moves” on them, Ken-burns style, but I am too worried about it getting boring.

    My biggest concern is if we want to go from the full wide-shot of the painting and then zoom into something super close-up, it wouldn’t be seamless. We’d start on the wide, but then zoom in and have to switch to the close-up. But, I’m even thinking that I could shoot multiple shots of hte painting and “stitch” them together in Photoshop.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy