Activity › Forums › Cinematography › Return of Process Photography??
-
Return of Process Photography??
Posted by Joe Piazzo on September 22, 2015 at 3:05 pmI have been watching a lot of 1950’s films lately – some of them with tons of rear projection process shots. Some good, a lot bad. Tracking and green screen has certainly eliminated the need for that today – or has it?
Just wondering what people might think – but with super bright 4K digital projection, digital image perspective control and such – I wonder, particularly in lower budget situations – if it may re-exploring?
Jason Jenkins replied 10 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 5 Replies -
5 Replies
-
Mark Suszko
September 22, 2015 at 3:34 pmFor live stage performance, certainly. Drama or music works well with this – saw a very nice staging of “Sunset Boulevard” (the musical) done like this. For videos or films, rear projection creates a “look” that is distinctive and somewhat artificial… which can either take you out of the story, or enhance it, if you’re not trying specifically for realism. For a dreamy or surrealist flavor, it could work. It has a niche.
-
Todd Terry
September 22, 2015 at 4:58 pmI certainly think it has its place…
A little while back we did the poor man’s version using footage displayed in a plasma television screen outside a car window. We were doing some automotive stuff, and it was easier/faster/cheaper to do it that way than shoot practically on location at night…
https://fantasticplastic.com/portfolio/news032.html
I just bought a couple of video projectors for another project, so I might try some more of this in the future.
T2
__________________________________
Todd Terry
Creative Director
Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
fantasticplastic.com

-
Mark Suszko
September 23, 2015 at 1:59 pmThat example (the car window shot) is incredibly good! Did you find it necessary to use plasma vs. LED, or was it just a case of using what was on hand?
-
Todd Terry
September 23, 2015 at 2:38 pmThanks, Mark… I thought it was passable.
Purely a matter of what was convenient. Honestly, I called it a “plasma” monitor just by default, now that I think about it that might be an LED monitor. Or LCD. Or OLED. I’d have to go upstairs and look and I’m lazy. Now that I think about it I don’t think it’s a plasma because it’s not that heavy. We just grabbed the one from our conference room because it’s the only large screen in the building that’s “loose” (not mounted on a wall or hung from a ceiling). Pure convenience.
Actually a bigger one would have worked better (I think that’s a 42″) because we had to put it up RIGHT outside the car in order for it to cover all of the window area on screen. So I produced several versions of the insert clip with different levels of blurriness so we could pick one that looked at least semi-realistic.
The fact that it is only a two-second shot also helps.
Giving away my cheapskate secrets here, that scene was lit using only a couple of three-buck LED puck lights from Harbor Freight.
T2
__________________________________
Todd Terry
Creative Director
Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
fantasticplastic.com

-
Jason Jenkins
September 24, 2015 at 11:20 pm[Todd Terry] “Giving away my cheapskate secrets here, that scene was lit using only a couple of three-buck LED puck lights from Harbor Freight.”
Of course, that cheap trick only works when you have a camera that can see in the dark.
Jason Jenkins
Flowmotion Media
Video production… with style!Check out my Mormon.org profile.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up