Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Cinematography Return of Process Photography??

  • Return of Process Photography??

    Posted by Joe Piazzo on September 22, 2015 at 3:05 pm

    I have been watching a lot of 1950’s films lately – some of them with tons of rear projection process shots. Some good, a lot bad. Tracking and green screen has certainly eliminated the need for that today – or has it?

    Just wondering what people might think – but with super bright 4K digital projection, digital image perspective control and such – I wonder, particularly in lower budget situations – if it may re-exploring?

    Jason Jenkins replied 10 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Mark Suszko

    September 22, 2015 at 3:34 pm

    For live stage performance, certainly. Drama or music works well with this – saw a very nice staging of “Sunset Boulevard” (the musical) done like this. For videos or films, rear projection creates a “look” that is distinctive and somewhat artificial… which can either take you out of the story, or enhance it, if you’re not trying specifically for realism. For a dreamy or surrealist flavor, it could work. It has a niche.

  • Todd Terry

    September 22, 2015 at 4:58 pm

    I certainly think it has its place…

    A little while back we did the poor man’s version using footage displayed in a plasma television screen outside a car window. We were doing some automotive stuff, and it was easier/faster/cheaper to do it that way than shoot practically on location at night…

    https://fantasticplastic.com/portfolio/news032.html

    I just bought a couple of video projectors for another project, so I might try some more of this in the future.

    T2

    __________________________________
    Todd Terry
    Creative Director
    Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
    fantasticplastic.com

  • Mark Suszko

    September 23, 2015 at 1:59 pm

    That example (the car window shot) is incredibly good! Did you find it necessary to use plasma vs. LED, or was it just a case of using what was on hand?

  • Todd Terry

    September 23, 2015 at 2:38 pm

    Thanks, Mark… I thought it was passable.

    Purely a matter of what was convenient. Honestly, I called it a “plasma” monitor just by default, now that I think about it that might be an LED monitor. Or LCD. Or OLED. I’d have to go upstairs and look and I’m lazy. Now that I think about it I don’t think it’s a plasma because it’s not that heavy. We just grabbed the one from our conference room because it’s the only large screen in the building that’s “loose” (not mounted on a wall or hung from a ceiling). Pure convenience.

    Actually a bigger one would have worked better (I think that’s a 42″) because we had to put it up RIGHT outside the car in order for it to cover all of the window area on screen. So I produced several versions of the insert clip with different levels of blurriness so we could pick one that looked at least semi-realistic.

    The fact that it is only a two-second shot also helps.

    Giving away my cheapskate secrets here, that scene was lit using only a couple of three-buck LED puck lights from Harbor Freight.

    T2

    __________________________________
    Todd Terry
    Creative Director
    Fantastic Plastic Entertainment, Inc.
    fantasticplastic.com

  • Jason Jenkins

    September 24, 2015 at 11:20 pm

    [Todd Terry] “Giving away my cheapskate secrets here, that scene was lit using only a couple of three-buck LED puck lights from Harbor Freight.”

    Of course, that cheap trick only works when you have a camera that can see in the dark.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

    Check out my Mormon.org profile.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy