-
Resolve Lite 12.3 to 12.5 system weirdness skip trailing zeros Resolve 469 Error
I just upgraded from Resolve 12.3 to 12.5. Just five minutes later when I went to to my timeline lots of my clips were gagging and lagging. My super duper MacPro’s fan went ballistic and went on high speed and my MacBook Pro got really hot So I tried something. I cut out a part of my timeline that was lagging, replaced it with non-lagging footage from the same timeline. Then I deleted the non-lagging footage from that spot. I put back in the footage that had been lagging just 10 seconds before, and it did not lag. But a new section of the timeline now lagged.
I checked my Mac System and these were the errors I was getting
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:09:27.502 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/30/16 10:09:27.697 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:09:27.697 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:09:27.697 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/30/16 10:09:27.698 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:09:27.698 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:09:27.698 PM Resolve[4353]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6I don’t think this is a problem on my end, and only happened with the upgrade. I can’t really edit anything at the moment. Its all gagging. I even shut down my computer, re-booted, and just ran Resolve, no other program at all whatsoever. The same thing happened, the fan sped up, got hot, and these skip trailing zeros messages came in again
8/30/16 10:41:17.946 PM Resolve[469]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/30/16 10:41:17.946 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:41:17.946 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:41:17.946 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/30/16 10:42:20.851 PM Resolve[469]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/30/16 10:42:20.851 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/30/16 10:42:20.851 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/30/16 10:42:20.851 PM Resolve[469]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6What is this? How do I make it stop!
-
3 Replies
-
What kind of source material are you using? How are the drives rated using BMD’s Speed Test?
In truth, I don’t think MacBook Pros are ideal for Resolve, but they can work to a point if you’re using HD proxies with a simple format like ProRes 422.
-
Marc:
Thanks, but all my footage was just fine in 12.2. The second I upgraded to 12.5, the instant, the trouble happened. This is a threading issue with Resolve. and the Mac. Am I the only one having this issue? The new update was as of August 11, 2016I upgraded my OS to Yosemite 10.10.5 because on the install for the newest version it said I needed to do that. In old version I had mixed 24 fps and 25fps. I converted teh 24 to 25 fps. I then set all my preferences to 25 fps, including the preference for editing to 25 fps as well as the default. I rebooted, restarted, and tried again.
Someone who is a Resolve engineer needs to look at this and pronto. Its from the new 12.5.1 on August 11. At the end it ask me to look t Bootcamp. This is way bast my my ability to troubleshoot. It says there were excessive wakeups. I don’t know what a wakeup is, but this is ominious sounding –
observed wakeups rate (per sec): 9063; Maximum permitted wakeups rate (per sec): 150; Observation period: 300 seconds; Task lifetime number of wakeups: 1745136
Ellen8/31/16 1:16:54.981 AM Resolve[882]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/31/16 1:16:54.981 AM Resolve[882]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/31/16 1:16:54.981 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/31/16 1:16:54.981 AM Resolve[882]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/31/16 1:16:54.982 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/31/16 1:16:54.982 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/31/16 1:16:54.982 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/31/16 1:16:54.982 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/31/16 1:16:54.982 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/31/16 1:16:54.984 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/31/16 1:16:54.984 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/31/16 1:16:54.984 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/31/16 1:16:54.984 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/31/16 1:16:54.985 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/31/16 1:16:54.985 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: AVF_Get_Standalone_PPS, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/31/16 1:17:03.909 AM Resolve[882]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/31/16 1:17:03.909 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 8
8/31/16 1:17:03.909 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 7
8/31/16 1:17:03.910 AM Resolve[882]: GVA warning: init, skip trailing zeros pps size = 6
8/31/16 1:17:03.910 AM Resolve[882]: AVF error: Perf capability check failed: 0xe00002be
8/31/16 1:17:07.524 AM Resolve[882]: Error loading /Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/HAL/JackRouter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/JackRouter: dlopen(/Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/HAL/JackRouter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/JackRouter, 262): Library not loaded: /Library/Frameworks/Jackmp.framework/Versions/A/Jackmp
Referenced from: /Library/Audio/Plug-Ins/HAL/JackRouter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/JackRouter
Reason: no suitable image found. Did find:
/Library/Frameworks/Jackmp.framework/Versions/A/Jackmp: no matching architecture in universal wrapper
/Library/Frameworks/Jackmp.framework/Versions/A/Jackmp: no matching architecture in universal wrapper
8/31/16 1:17:07.524 AM
Resolve[882]: Cannot find function pointer New_JackRouterPlugIn for factory 7CB18864-927D-48B5-904C-CCFBCFBC7ADD in CFBundle/CFPlugIn 0x2301e33d0 (bundle, not loaded)
8/31/16 1:17:14.000 AM kernel[0]: process
Resolve[882] caught causing excessive wakeups. Observed wakeups rate (per sec): 9104; Maximum permitted wakeups rate (per sec): 150; Observation period: 300 seconds; Task lifetime number of wakeups: 481134
8/31/16 1:17:14.195 AM ReportCrash[901]: Invoking spindump for pid=882 wakeups_rate=9104 duration=5 because of excessive wakeups
8/31/16 1:17:14.376 AM spindump[475]: Saved wakeups_resource.diag report for Resolve version 12.5.1 (12.5.1034) to /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Resolve_2016-08-31-011714_Macintosh-c82a141573fa.wakeups_resource.diag
8/31/16 1:18:58.000 AM kernel[0]: process
Resolve[882] caught causing excessive wakeups. Observed wakeups rate (per sec): 9063; Maximum permitted wakeups rate (per sec): 150; Observation period: 300 seconds; Task lifetime number of wakeups: 1745136
8/31/16 1:18:58.704 AM com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.ReportCrash[905]) Endpoint has been activated through legacy launch(3) APIs. Please switch to XPC or bootstrap_check_in(): com.apple.ReportCrash
8/31/16 1:18:58.705 AM ReportCrash[905]: Invoking spindump for pid=882 wakeups_rate=9063 duration=5 because of excessive wakeups -
Marc:
Also, I went over to the BlackMagic Forum, and they are talking about NVidia CUDA 2.0 incompatibilities with 12.5. I think I am onto something with this.https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=47271
Ellen
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up