Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Request for Recommendation

  • Request for Recommendation

    Posted by Mark Grady on November 24, 2011 at 4:25 am

    Hi Folks,

    Since switching to Canon DSLR for primary footage, the Quicktime large files seem to be too much for my computer using Sony Vegas 8. Since I’m editing long, feature-length projects, does anyone have any recommendations on specific PC requirements (processor, RAM, etc.) I should look for to keep up with the memory and large files?

    Thank you very much for any feedback.

    Dave Haynie replied 14 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Steve Rhoden

    November 24, 2011 at 7:39 am
  • John Rofrano

    November 24, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    [Mark Grady] “Since switching to Canon DSLR for primary footage, the Quicktime large files seem to be too much for my computer using Sony Vegas 8. “

    Vegas Pro 8.0 was not equipped to edit DSLR files. You should upgrade to Vegas Pro 11.0 if you want to use that camera and edit the files naively.

    Alternately, convert the footage to CineForm and continue using Vegas Pro 8.0 but for a little more than the price of CineForm you can upgrade to Vegas Pro 11.0.

    My advice is to download the trial of Vegas Pro 11.0 and see if it makes editing your projects easier. If it does, the you have your solution. If it doesn’t then CineForm should edit smoothly even on an old Dual Core PC. Of course, depending on your PC specs (which you didn’t list) you could just need a more powerful PC anyway.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Dave Haynie

    November 24, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    Yup. AVC editing was just functional in Vegas 8, and for some camera output, not stable. Also, for any serious HD work, you really want the 64-bit version of Vegas. Vegas 8.1 was the first 64-bit release, but it was more of a technology preview… it had issues.

    While its true that Canon’s Quicktime format is a bit easier on the CPU than AVCHD from a camcorder (Canon uses I and P frames only, plus 44Mb/s bitrate, rather than IPB frames and 24Mb/s… B frames require more CPU and memory to process), I would still want a fairly modern 4 to 6 core CPU with 8GB memory.

    That doesn’t have to be the very top of the line stuff, either. I saw 16GB of RAM on sale at Newegg this week for $60 or so. I have long been an advocate of buying technology “at the knee of the commodity curve”. At commodity prices, when pay twice as much, you get twice as much. At the high end, you might pay twice as much for only 25% more performance, maybe even less.

    -Dave

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy