Activity › Forums › Avid Media Composer › rendering equals loss of quality?
-
rendering equals loss of quality?
Posted by Dale on December 19, 2006 at 12:39 amJust wanting to demistify something for myself. When rendering effects/titles/cc’s etc does it mean a loss of a generation at all?
Grinner Hester replied 19 years, 4 months ago 4 Members · 3 Replies -
3 Replies
-
Sebastian Riezler
December 19, 2006 at 1:40 pma guy from our avid support once told me that if you render out a stack of vertical effects (more than one effect laying above each other; on V1, V2 aso.) you will have a loss of qualitiy. but he didn’t say if you can see it with your eyes or if you just can measure it.
anyway, he also told me if i have a stack of vertical effects i should make a subsequence of this effect (for further changes if necessary) and then use the collapse effect. this should do the trick.rock on
Riot -
Michael Hancock
December 20, 2006 at 11:29 pmI assume you mean if you have a vertical set of effects and you render all of them. If you do this you likely will have a loss of quality because you’ll be rendering V1, then rendering V2 which will rerender V1, then V3 will render which will rerender V2 and V1, etc…
From what I understand Avid works top down. If you have 4 tracks with effects you only need to render the top track, provided it completely covers all tracks below it. If it doesn’t you’ll have to render some of the tracks below. Do an expert render and you’ll see. If you have 8 tracks with effects and put a letterbox that covers the entire sequence on V9 you can render V9 only and be done. It will include all other effects below it.
If you select all track and collapse them what you’re essentially doing is adding one effect that covers all effects below it. This means Avid will render only that one effect–a submaster effect–and will include in its calculations all effects below.
I prefer to leave my tracks uncollapsed because it’s a lot easier to make changes. However, if I do collapse, I always duplicate the sequence first so I have a worker sequence and final sequence. Then I can make changes, select all, copy to clipboard, step into my final sequence submaster, overwrite, step out, render and take a break. Sounds like a lot but it’s really only a few keystrokes and I’m done.
Mike.
Oh yeah, render in High Quality if you have time to kill. It will ensure the best quality possible but takes significantly longer.
-
Grinner Hester
December 25, 2006 at 2:45 amNot is you select 1:1 in your media creation settings for renders.

Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up