-
Render with CPU?
Posted by Jono Grant on September 8, 2020 at 10:21 pmHi there, I’m rendering a music video with a cartoon (BCC) effect and many transitions/clips etc.. The 5 minute song took 15 hours to render yesterday! Ouch!
Anyhow, someone asked if I was using only CPU to render which is set to use CPU by default in vegas.
I have an Nvidia quadro p4000, should I render this differently?
The options are: CPU, OpenCL or CUDA. Not sure what one to choose.
Any idea?
Thanks
Jono
Steve Rhoden replied 5 years, 8 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies -
7 Replies
-
Bernie Lademann
September 8, 2020 at 11:13 pmHi Jono,
While I cannot tell you which way to go with your particular hardware, I can tell you what I have found with choosing the what to use. I have a machine which has Intel i9-9920X and 3 x Nvidia Quadro P4000 CPUs. I chose this hardware configuration because I use both Vegas Pro (for video) and Redshift (for 3D animation) in my daily work. I have found that there is very little difference in using the CPU and the GPU for render in Vegas on my machine, despite the fact that it has 3 GPUs!
My suggestion is try a render test of a much shorter area in your project (10 seconds of video, for example) with the following (assuming you want to create MP4 files with h264 or h265 compression):
Sony AVC
Magix AVC – CPU
Magix AVC – NVIDIA NVEC
Then pick the fastest one. The quality of the CPU renderer was once very poor with lots of artefacts, however, I cannot fault it in current versions of Vegas, so you can trust that the output will be good with either CPU or GPU.
IMPORTANT: You must set the “Dynamic RAM Preview” to 0, in your settings. I guarantee that you will have a messed up output if this is set to anything other than 0. This is always been the case for me in all versions of Vegas I have ever used.
Good Luck
Bernie
-
Graham Bernard
September 9, 2020 at 1:50 am -
Graham Bernard
September 9, 2020 at 2:29 amI’m doing a 5 minute of B Cartoon Look to a MAGIX 422 Intermediate MOV. No GPU option, that I can tell, and that’s estimating 40 minutes.
-
Jono Grant
September 9, 2020 at 5:56 amI downloaded the CUDA toolkit and set the render settings to use CUDA if available.
Now I see in windows task manager/performance that the GPU is taking a bit of the stress off the CPU. Not a lot mind you, but as you say, I guess the BCC plugin is more CPU intensive.
I’ll inform about whether it was any faster once my render is complete.
Cheers
Jono
-
Francois Pénzes
September 9, 2020 at 12:20 pmHi Jono
I’m curious, have you tried rendering without the cartoon look. I’m asking because way back, I had a clip I was trying to render but it was taking way to long. I did test renders of the clip of only 1 minute and and for each one, removed 1 effect at a time to isolate what the culprit was. Can’t recall exactly what the problem was but I do remember that the culprit was not the one I expected.
Cheers !
-
Jono Grant
September 9, 2020 at 9:18 pmThe cartoon effect is definitely the culprit. Without it, the file would render in a few minutes.
-
Steve Rhoden
September 10, 2020 at 1:27 pmJono, BCC Cartoon effect is the reason why your renders take so long. It is an extremely demanding system intensive filter!
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up