Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Render to AVI good versus best

  • Render to AVI good versus best

    Posted by Ozvideo on February 23, 2006 at 5:02 am

    If an area of your project is getting complicated I have often heard that that the best thing to do is to render out that section as an AVI file & then import that new clip into your project to make things a little complicated. When You go to render out that section I notice that you specify to render out at different qualities like best, good. etc. If these options really work I suppose that I should always use best because it will have to be re rendered again later. Does anyone know if this really makes a difference? If it does I suppose that the render to new track would be exactly the same situation.

    Ozvideo replied 20 years, 2 months ago 2 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Donatello

    February 23, 2006 at 5:45 am

    from sony Vegas:

    The simple explanation is to use “Good” most of the time. This is the default setting. If you want more info, read on…

    Quality: Best
    Scaling: bi-cubic/integration
    Field Handling: on
    Field Rendering: on (setting dependent)
    Framerate Resample/IFR: on (switch dependent)

    Quality: Good
    Scaling: bi-linear
    Field Handling: on
    Field Rendering: on (setting dependent)
    Framerate Resample/IFR: on (switch dependent)

    Quality: Preview
    Scaling: bi-linear
    Field Handling: off
    Field Rendering: off
    Framerate Resample/IFR: always off

    Quality: Draft
    Scaling: point sample
    Field Handling: off
    Field Rendering: off
    Framerate Resample/IFR: always off

    ——————————
    Scaling:
    ——————————

    These methods come into play when conforming sources that differ from the output size. They are also used when panned, cropped or resized in track motion.

    Bi-Cubic/Integration – Best image resizing algorithm available in Vegas. Quality differences will be most noticeable when using very large stills or stretching small sources.

    Bi-linear – Best compromise between speed and quality. This method will produce good results in most cases.

    Point Sampling – Fast but produces poor results.

    ——————————
    Field Handling:
    ——————————

    This refers to the field conformance stage of Vegas’s video engine. This includes Interlaced to Progressive conversion, Interlaced to interlaced output when scaling, motion or geometric Video FX and Transitions are involved. Skipping this stage can sometimes result in bad artifacts when high motion interlaced sources are used.

    ———————————
    Field Rendering:
    ———————————

    When the output format is interlaced, Vegas will internally render at the field rate (twice the frame rate) to achieve smooth motion and FX interpolation.

    ———————————
    Frame Rate Resample / IFR (Interlace Flicker Reduction):
    ———————————

    Frame Rate Resample:

    This kicks in when speed changes are made through Velocity Envelopes and/or event stretching. In can also be used when up-converting low frame rate sources. This only kicks in if the resample switch is turned on _and_ quality is set to good or best.

    Interlace Flicker Reduction:

    This kicks in if the event switch is turned on and quality is set to good or best. See Vegas’ documentation for a description of this switch.

    ———————————

    Lastly, please note that Vegas will bypass any or all of these potentially expensive processing stages if the resulting output won’t be affected by the process (e.g. no-recompress pass-through, field render bypass when settings don’t change and so on …). Differences in the output between different quality settings may not always be noticeable, but that largely depends on various attributes of the source media being used. If you want to see some of these differences first hand, trying using extremely large or small sources or high-motion interlaced shots with extreme pan/crop operations.

    Please note that you should never render your final project using anything other than good or best when interlaced sources are involved unless the project only contains cuts. If preview quality is used, the resulting video will vary between acceptable to disastrous depending on your project and its media content

  • Ozvideo

    February 23, 2006 at 7:16 am

    Thanks for that answer. I suppose that since all of my DVD players can handle progressive scan & here most new players have has it available as well that I should us this when rendering out. Noturally my TV displays progressive. If this is advisable does it matter if I render segments as I go or wait for the final render to do this?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy