render times

[Daniel Hughes]

I don’t think it really matters what order you do things, if it’s still going to be be the same effects and output in the end. Vegas has the same amount of rendering work to do.

There’s something about the wording that makes me think you’re getting mixed up with ‘rendering’ and ‘editing’ or ‘workflow’

If you were talking about workflow, yes, you’re probably better getting all of the clips, events or shots cut they way you like, then start your work on the audio or move to effects and colour correction.

If you do the effects before you cut it, your previews are going to be laggier and you’re going to make mistakes and then you’ll realise you don’t like the effects and colours you initially used and it’ll just be a big messy shambles!

Daniel Hughes
Amateur Writer, Director,
Director of Photography
United Kingdom

[Patti Arrigo]

Hi Danniel Thanks
Your right I was getting mixed up with rendering and editing and workflow. I haven’t learned to talk the talk yet. Your answer helped I understood exactly what you said. Thanks very much.
Just a note. Your comment about doing the effects first before I
cut it. (I have been doing that.) Talk about a mess a mess doesn’t describe how bad it got.

[Daniel Hughes]

You’ll pick it up quickly!
Glad that helped then :).

Daniel Hughes
Amateur Writer, Director,
Director of Photography
United Kingdom

[Danny Hays]

I would chroma, color correct each camera in multicam mode and render. That’s one recompression. The more times you render, (recompress) the lower the quality gets.

[Patti Arrigo]

Thank you Danny