-
Render of FFMPEG Copy lower quality than Original Render?
I feel like an FFMPEG forum would be more appropriate, but people here seem to know about it so I’ll leave this here.
I have a raw file of computer capture which is 22.7 GB large. There is only a minute long clip of that raw file which I wanted to keep for editing purposes, so in order to save disk space, I looked into tools which destructively slice. I used FFmpeg with the line:
ffmpeg -ss [START TIME] -i [INPUT].mp4 -map 0 -c copy -t [DURATION] [OUTPUT].mp4I used -map 0 to map all 5 of my channels (1 video, 4 audio) and -c copy to avoid re-encoding.
This resulted in a nice small file only a little over a minute long which contained the footage I wanted. All video and audio streams were supposedly copied, retaining the original quality, but I feel like the FFmpeg footage is worse quality than the original, when watching the rendered videos of each.
Instead of uploading to Youtube and decreasing the quality further, I created a DropBox with the full, non-compressed renders. Each of them are smaller than 180 GB.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jg0t4idezyung72/AACOIXvqmieQZPs8FzaOZqzOa?dl=0 (you’ll have to download the videos, don’t watch them through DropBox’s video player)I don’t know how to compare two videos for quality, but I’d like to assure that I’m preserving as much as possible from my original capture.
