Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Render of FFMPEG Copy lower quality than Original Render?

  • Render of FFMPEG Copy lower quality than Original Render?

    Posted by Thomas Ames on September 10, 2016 at 3:38 pm

    I feel like an FFMPEG forum would be more appropriate, but people here seem to know about it so I’ll leave this here.

    I have a raw file of computer capture which is 22.7 GB large. There is only a minute long clip of that raw file which I wanted to keep for editing purposes, so in order to save disk space, I looked into tools which destructively slice. I used FFmpeg with the line:

    ffmpeg -ss [START TIME] -i [INPUT].mp4 -map 0 -c copy -t [DURATION] [OUTPUT].mp4

    I used -map 0 to map all 5 of my channels (1 video, 4 audio) and -c copy to avoid re-encoding.

    This resulted in a nice small file only a little over a minute long which contained the footage I wanted. All video and audio streams were supposedly copied, retaining the original quality, but I feel like the FFmpeg footage is worse quality than the original, when watching the rendered videos of each.

    Instead of uploading to Youtube and decreasing the quality further, I created a DropBox with the full, non-compressed renders. Each of them are smaller than 180 GB.
    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jg0t4idezyung72/AACOIXvqmieQZPs8FzaOZqzOa?dl=0 (you’ll have to download the videos, don’t watch them through DropBox’s video player)

    I don’t know how to compare two videos for quality, but I’d like to assure that I’m preserving as much as possible from my original capture.

    László Kovács replied 9 years, 8 months ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • László Kovács

    September 10, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    Hi,

    you did it right.

    To my eyes, the 2 files look identical.
    And they are, apart from the fact, that the ffmpeg output starts 3 frames later.

    I placed both file onto timeline, and synced (that’s how I know the 3 frames delay).
    Then I substracted first original from ffmpeg, then ffmpeg from riginal.
    Both resulted in a pure black screen, so I think they are identical in quality.
    I suspect, the worse quality from ffmpeg you think/feel to see is some kind of placebo.

    Best regards

    László Kovács

  • Thomas Ames

    September 12, 2016 at 2:12 pm

    Hi László,

    Thanks for the response! That sounds like a pretty intricate method of comparison; I really appreciate it.

    I did suspect that the lesser quality was just me being nitpicky and expecting that my method was incorrect and you’ve pretty much assured me of that.

    Thanks for your time.

    -Tom

  • László Kovács

    September 13, 2016 at 5:01 am

    I’m glad to help 😉

    You’re welcome!

    Best regards

    László Kovács

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy