Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve render cache clip source -> tracking speed

  • render cache clip source -> tracking speed

    Posted by Andi Winter on September 23, 2015 at 10:35 am

    if i render cache clip source all of my 2,5k dpx-shots to prores4x4 and after that
    want to eg stabilize the shot, it seems that the render cache gets thrown away and
    davinci does take the 2,5dpx original shots as its basis for tracking.

    this is kinda disappointing. if i generate dpx proxies via the proxy manager it works
    well, but does use up a lot of hdd-space 🙁

    it is a 16mm scan and therefore a stabilisation of nearly every shot will be needed to
    compensate the little “shaking” introduced by the camera.

    the caching system seems to fail to serve my demands.

    Oyvind Stiauren replied 10 years, 7 months ago 5 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Andi Winter

    September 23, 2015 at 10:41 am

    ps: in case of dpx consolidate via the timeline doesn’t seem to work either 🙁

  • Sascha Haber

    September 23, 2015 at 11:44 am

    I strongly suggest using PFClean for those tasks..
    Resolve is by no means up for this.
    Not only due to the lack of a robust cache system, but also because you will into trouble with the sprocket wear data.
    PFClean with perform that kind of stabilise by analysing the film wear and saving each frames offset in a data file.
    I just cleaned a short movie with it and its just a different world.

    Resolve 11.3 – Smoke 2015 EXT1 – Sapphire 8
    Colorist / VFX Guru / Aerial footage nerd
    https://vimeo.com/saschahaber
    https://dk.linkedin.com/in/saschahaber

  • Patrick Morgan

    September 23, 2015 at 2:14 pm

    PFC will do the job, but it is pricey, we have Phoenix, that will also fix splice jumps while we’re
    at it, but that is even more expensive 😉 (but really, really good – but then I would say so…)

    Alternatively – download Fusion – it can help out a lot, depending on how the material was scanned
    you may or may not have sprocket holes to help. Track the frame corners on one side.

    If the film was a reprint, there is a chance that even using the sprockets won’t work since the image
    is moving relative to the actual film. As a last comment, if you are doing restoration, make sure you
    stabilise the frame, you don’t want to change the content of the film (unless required) by fixing the
    camera movement.

    Patrick
    Digital Vision

    Patrick Morgan
    Product Marketing Manager
    http://www.digitalvision.tv

  • Joakim Ziegler

    September 24, 2015 at 10:32 am

    A matter of taste, I guess. I find pfClean’s stabilize functionality to be so cumbersome to set up and use that it’s almost useless, especially for stabilizing lots of shots.

    Although, to be honest, the best solution to this is a scanner that does optical stabilization, which ours does, so the image is always rock steady, including eliminating splice jumps completely… That only leaves gate weave on opticals, which is easy to fix in Resolve.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Andi Winter

    September 24, 2015 at 11:31 am

    thanks for all the comments!

    but my main question/comment was about the render cache.
    i ended up freeing some diskspace on my fast raid and grade
    from the dpx-sequences directly.

    and the sabilization in davinci-resolve works great for that kind
    of shots that i have (only tripod total shots, without panning or
    tilting or zooming).

    but yes, if i had to do with handheld-camera-work i would be
    out of luck inside resolve i guess…

  • Oyvind Stiauren

    September 25, 2015 at 12:04 am

    If I understand your problem correctly, I think there are two ways to do what you want:

    1. If you are able to use Resolve 12 you can use the “Optimize Media” function. If correctly configured in the Settings, it will make proxy ProRes files in 1:1 resolution.

    2. If you have to use Resolve 11, you can import the whole DPX file to Resolve, put it in a timeline and render to ProRes using the “Individual Source Clips” and “Render at source resolution” options in the Render Settings. Then use the ProRes files to work with and later re-connect the DPX files using the “Reconnect from bin(s)” option. This way is not as elegant as the first one, but it works. Getting “Reconnect from bin(s)” to do what you want it to do can be difficult. A good start is to make sure that the “Reel Name” on both the DPX and ProRes files are the same.


    Oyvind Stiauren
    Post production supervisor, Colorist
    Terminal

    Mexico City

  • Andi Winter

    September 25, 2015 at 9:05 pm

    thanks Oyvind,

    i am still on resolve 11 because of an unfinished project! but i could go
    the other route you posted, and i really nearly did, but then i thought:
    of course i can render my proxies manually, and later reconnect, but
    shouldn’t this be possible with the built-in render-cache automatically?

    but thanks, this would be a great manual workaround.

  • Oyvind Stiauren

    September 25, 2015 at 10:58 pm

    i am still on resolve 11 because of an unfinished project! but i could go
    the other route you posted, and i really nearly did, but then i thought:
    of course i can render my proxies manually, and later reconnect, but
    shouldn’t this be possible with the built-in render-cache automatically?

    The problem with all the render cache options in Resolve 11 is that the caching is done in the current Timeline resolution, and not the original clip resolution. So you’re left with the two options I mentioned before.


    Oyvind Stiauren
    Post production supervisor, Colorist
    Terminal

    Mexico City

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy