-
Removing hums/buzzes…then voice is worse!
Posted by Ron Whitaker on March 23, 2013 at 3:45 pmI’m testing the demo versions of Izotope RX2 and Wave Arts Mr. Noise, which is similar to RX2’s Denoiser.
In either one, when I “learn” the background hum, then apply it to the audio file, the voice of the person talking suddenly sounds muffled/tinny/underwater-like.
How can I rid the audio file of a slight background hum, yet keep the rich sound of the voice?
Thanks.
Alexey Lukin replied 13 years, 1 month ago 6 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Roger Bansemer
March 23, 2013 at 4:15 pmIf you’re using the denoise feature, if you sample it in the advance mode, you can better seperate the tonal(voice) from the broadband (background) a bit better.
Also check the “output noise only” box and slide things around until you start to hear too much voice. When you start to hear voice you know your cutting into the voice and it will begin to sound hollow.Roger Bansemer
-
Bob Peterson
March 23, 2013 at 6:40 pmHow are you selecting the sample that you want the software to learn? The sample duration should be very short, and should not contain anything except the sound you want eliminated. Also, how loud is the hum or noise versus the voice you are trying to preserve?
-
Steve Rhoden
March 23, 2013 at 10:24 pmJust adjust the sliders Ron until your audio sounds right.
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
1-876-832-4956 -
Ron Whitaker
March 24, 2013 at 12:27 amWell, there’s another problem: when I adjust the sliders while playing the audio, it doesn’t make any sound change.
Does adjust sliders in the demo while playing the audio not work?
-
Ron Whitaker
March 24, 2013 at 1:20 amActually, I’ll be honest: Audacity totally beat Izoptope as far as removing the background hum sound! Surprising, but true!
The only thing, it left the person talking sounding kinda tinny/underewaterish. Can I restore the sound of the person talking with a plugin in SVP? If so, which one would work the best?
Thanks.
-
Colin Morris
March 24, 2013 at 2:09 amRon, One technique you can use is to create two separate audio files and apply a different plugin to each. You can then combine the two to create a final file.
Colin Mendez Morris
ArsMusica
http://www.arsmusica.ca -
Steve Rhoden
March 25, 2013 at 7:55 amAudacity totally beat Izoptope as far as removing the background hum sound!
If you get to understand how to use Izotope RX PROPERLY you
would realize how wrong that statement is. Do you watch many of
the online tutorials?Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
1-876-832-4956 -
Alexey Lukin
March 25, 2013 at 7:16 pmPost a sample here that is a few seconds long. We’ll suggest you the right settings. Generally hum is more effectively treated by the Denoiser module, using algorithms C and D. Train the denoiser on a sample of hum (make it as long as possible, but still containing only noise) and adjust your Tonal/Broadband Reduction sliders for appropriate treatment.
-
Ron Whitaker
March 25, 2013 at 7:33 pmAlexey:
Been there, done ALL that!
Right now, I’m just going to stick with Audacity. Being a bargain shopper (read: cheap) I simply refuse to pay the price Izotope is asking for RX2.
Maybe down the road…
Anyway, someone suggested a sound sample so play with. Here it is:
5717_cheriespresentationsample.wav.zip
-
Alexey Lukin
March 25, 2013 at 7:50 pmThis is definitely a food for Denoiser, not Hum Remover. Here’s what can be done in RX: 5718_5717cheriespresentationsamplerx.wav.zip
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up