Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy red text on black- why so blurry?

  • red text on black- why so blurry?

    Posted by Hamish Lyons on December 8, 2007 at 5:40 pm

    It seems no matter what I try, a red text on a black background always has a blurry edge to it, unless I change the colour which I am not at liberty to do. Has anyone encountered this issue and is there some way of dealing with this?

    Hamish Lyons replied 18 years, 5 months ago 11 Members · 12 Replies
  • 12 Replies
  • Tom Wolsky

    December 8, 2007 at 5:54 pm

    What format are you working in? Red is really, really hard to compress. Usually you don’t use red beyond 190-200. If you’re redder than that you’re going to have problems.

    All the best,

    Tom

    Class on Demand DVDs “Complete Training for FCP6,” “Basic Training for FCS2” and “Final Cut Express Made Easy”
    Author: “Final Cut Pro 5 Editing Essentials” and “Final Cut Express 3.5 HD Editing Workshop”

  • David Roth weiss

    December 8, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    What you’re seeing is DV compression at its worst. If you change the compressor in sequence settings to DVC50, Pro Res, 8-bit or 10-bit uncompressed and re-render you will see a huge difference.

    Test it out to see for yourself, then the proper workflow is to cut everything in the DV timeline and then change the compressor and re-render when you’re completely finished editing so that you’re not having to render constantly when your in the creative stages…

    Make sense???

    David

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Dylan Reeve

    December 8, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    This is probably a DV compression thing… But also, red-black contrast is always a problem with composite video (which is what a lot of people use with the DVD players and VCRs, and is what all analogue broadcasting is) – I can’t remember the specifics, but something about where red is on the spectrum (shortest visible wavelength) and the method of modulation use to encapsulate the luma and chroma signals. I understood it in the lectures, but it’s all escaped me now.

    Basically the end result is that solid red, especially on a solid (or black) background is never a great idea with video. However with less saturation the problems are less pronounced.

  • David Fortin

    December 8, 2007 at 10:01 pm

    If my long term memory is any good, I remember something from the TV 101 lectures in college about the three colors that make up the video signal Green, Blue and Red. And that out of the three, red has the least amount of information in the signal, so red is the worse reproducible (if that’s a word) color.

    I think you’ll have trouble no matter what compression you use. If you have ever rented a movie that has red credits over black, they look nice and crisp in the theater, but when you watch it at home on DVD, you can barely even read it.

    Dual 2.5 G5 {OS 10.4.9}
    4.5 GB RAM
    FCP2
    NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
    DeckLink SP
    ATTO ExpressPCI UL4S
    Medea Video Raid RT320
    Sony UVW-1800
    Pansonic AG-DV2500
    Media Cleaner Pro 6
    AfterEffects 7
    Squeeze 4.2 (PC)
    ViewSonic 19″ LCD
    Optiquest 21″ CRT
    Bella EZ Keyboard

  • Alan Lacey

    December 8, 2007 at 10:06 pm

    Saturated red is very low luminance level and with composite, Y/C and YUV it’s only the luminance channel that has greater bandwidth.

    What you’re seeing is the lower bandwidth quality of the chroma channels. Increase the red luma somehow – ie desaturate.

    Even going uncompressed (YUV) saturated reds will have less ‘sharpness’ than white, greys or blacks.

    Alan

  • Paul Provost

    December 9, 2007 at 5:16 am

    red + video = bad
    especially SD – HD is a little better

  • Rafael Amador

    December 9, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Everybody right. Red is the most difficult color to manage. Difficult to compress and difficult to filter. That’s the reason why nobody try use a red screen to make a chroma-key.
    But fallow the David’s adice and set your sequence with a better codec.
    Rafael

    PPC G5 2x2Gh 4GbRAM/BlackMagic SD/PMBP 17″Core2Duo 4GbRAM
    JVC DTV-17″/FCS2/AE CS3/COMBUSTION/SHAKE

  • Tim Wilson

    December 9, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    I also had some of those “not at liberty to change the color scenarios,” and they were a nightmare.

    What worked best for me was combining two techniques here — a black border, and red that looked downright pink on the computer screen, but looked close enough to red on the broadcast monitor that I never had a client think twice.

    So use a broadcast monitor so you won’t go astray. Even better, output to your delivery format and check THAT on a broadcast monitor. Tweak to taste.

    Don’t forget to use black at no more than 16. I never trusted clipping filters.

    Note about red-screen compositing — it’s frequently used for claymation and other non-human elements. It also works great for underwater shots where blue and green are the order of the day. I’ve also found that there are some ranges of dark skin, especially very dark skin, that reach almost into the blue spectrum, where red works better.

    Markertek sells a kit of Rosco keying gear that includes red paint and tape along with green and blue. (In addition to tape, Markertek even sells mic and other cables in blue and green.)

    Rose Brand has a remarkable array of keying fabric, including orange and magenta — don’t forget the object of the game is to use the opposite color of the foreground.

    As you can tell, I’m a big fan or red keys for special purposes.

    And I believe that red text on black backgrounds is a pain, but you can do it.

    Tim Wilson, Creative Cow
    My Cow Blog
    Join my LinkedIn network

  • Kevin Jones

    December 9, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    Could someone explain in detail the DV workfow that David Roth Weiss mentions?
    Thanks.

    Kevin Jones

  • Chris Poisson

    December 9, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    Kevin,

    David is talking about simply changing the compression settings of your sequence, which, while forcing a render, can result in improved graphics and transitions etc. from a DV sequence to say, an 8bit one.

    Note that if you are monitoring via FireWire, you will not get real-time playback anymore, but you can still spot check your timeline after rendering.

    Best advice when working on a FireWire-based system is to wait till you’re sure your done to do this, and if it’s not obvious, this will not help if you are going to tape, only good for Web, DVD and similar delivery, as you can’t play uncompressed to tape via FireWire.

    Have a wonderful day.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy