Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Reconsidering FCPX in Hollywood

  • Neil Goodman

    April 30, 2018 at 11:27 pm

    [Andy Neil] ” 2 trailer houses,”

    which Trailer houses?

    I know Charlie is using it over there but curious where else?

  • Shawn Miller

    April 30, 2018 at 11:47 pm

    [Andy Neil] “Only that it can make a lot of sense for those companies that don’t want to rent seats at $50 a pop.”

    To be fair, that $50-$85 a month gets you much more than Premiere Pro. I think that’s one of the strengths of the Adobe subscription, the included tools are accessible enough for generalists but deep enough for dedicated specialists – that, and the talent pool for people who know After Effects, Photoshop, Premiere Pro and Illustrator is quite large.

    Shawn

  • Oliver Peters

    May 1, 2018 at 12:10 am

    [Andy Neil] “I wonder if the young editors you work with aren’t interested in FCPX because they don’t see it as a space they can advance in?”

    I think the answer is multi-faceted. There is certainly the “chicken or the egg” factor. Your odds of getting freelance work are better if you know Premiere than if you [only] know FCPX. However, many of these folks also have an interest in VFX and gaming. So AE is a natural starting point – even before any NLE. Once you work with AE, then the step to Premiere is quick and easy.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com

  • Oliver Peters

    May 1, 2018 at 12:14 am

    I think the fact that FCPX still doesn’t have a good answer to collaborative workflows is also a hindrance to adoption in this market.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com

  • Neil Goodman

    May 1, 2018 at 12:26 am

    [Oliver Peters] “I think the fact that FCPX still doesn’t have a good answer to collaborative workflows is also a hindrance to adoption in this market.”

    Maybe but PPRO’s was pretty lame at it too up until the latest versions (haven’t tried it out myself yet – were still on 2017)

    At work now – we have the most ridiculous “shared” workflow ever using PPRO. All the media is on a ISIS and then basically just an Editor exports their latest cut as a PPRO project and then if your the lucky one that picks it up for revisions or cutdowns you import that timeline into your current project. Then repeat until a cut is locked. Its a pain and gets very messy.

    I also think alot of it has to do with prospective jobs. If I was in LA and trying to get into TV and Film, it would be dumb to ignore Avid, and secondary PPRO. I aslo find people pay Avid editors higher rates for freelance jobs then jobs on PPRO, and the very very few freelance listings I have seen for FCPX (non bordcast/film) were super duper low. Could have something to do with it too.

  • Bill Davis

    May 1, 2018 at 12:43 am

    [Simon Ubsdell] “One can’t help feeling that if, more than two thirds of the way through its probable lifecycle, you’re still having to proselytise for a product to this degree to a particular market segment, then something is not quite fitting at a basic level.”

    Why should should they waste overmuch time proselytizing it at all?

    They grew from 2 million to 2.5 millions seats last year. At $299 (presuming nobody at all bought Motion or Compressor) – that’s mathematically just shy of 150 million dollars in FCP X revenue.

    If we speculate and imagine that Premier ALSO has 2 million active seats – (clearly not exclusively working pros because no stat I’ve ever seen says there are anywhere near that many actual shop based Pro editors out there – but this is speculation only!) and average between full subscribers and NLE only folks in rental revenue -say $35 a seat? They mathematically generated $70 million bucks, at best, last year? Not a bad business at all, but those two numbers are WAY far apart.

    So X, as it sits RIGHT now – is probably a lot more profitable than it’s competitors.

    Now if X stops selling tomorrow – and Adobe keeps people on the rental hook for years – it’s a BIG win for Adobe.

    But who wants to bet on an Apple collapse like that? Anyone?

    So what possible reason would Apple have to switch to a heavy marketing emphasis on the movie Biz?

    They likely make significantly more revenue than the competition already – simply by sticking to the marketing path they already are on.

    At the end of the day, these are businesses. Folks area happy when a product makes money. And the more the better?

    Creator of XinTwo – https://www.xintwo.com
    The shortest path to FCP X mastery.

  • Andy Neil

    May 1, 2018 at 1:36 am

    [Neil Goodman] “which Trailer houses? “

    I had a friend who said they were using it over at Trailer Park. I can’t remember the name of the 2nd place because I was just doing a tour there, but they did a lot of Disney work.

    Andy

    https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos

  • Oliver Peters

    May 1, 2018 at 1:39 am

    [Neil Goodman] “Maybe but PPRO’s was pretty lame at it too up until the latest versions (haven’t tried it out myself yet – were still on 2017)

    At work now – we have the most ridiculous “shared” workflow ever using PPRO. All the media is on a ISIS and then basically just an Editor exports their latest cut as a PPRO project and then if your the lucky one that picks it up for revisions or cutdowns you import that timeline into your current project. Then repeat until a cut is locked. Its a pain and gets very messy. “

    You need to get current. Our shop has 7 edit stations. All projects and media live on the NAS. Any editor can open any project at any time. The first editor to open a project has write permission to it. Subsequent editors who open it at the same time have read-only permission. You can toggle write control as needed among the users. You can also now have multiple projects open at once (like FCP7) and copy & paste/drag & drop between them. Yes, importing sequences via Media Browser is also still an option.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com

  • Oliver Peters

    May 1, 2018 at 1:44 am

    [Bill Davis] ” and average between full subscribers and NLE only folks in rental revenue -say $35 a seat? They mathematically generated $70 million bucks, at best, last year?”

    Your math is off. $35/month x 12 month/year = $420/year/seat. 2,000,000 seats = $840,000,000/year.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com

  • Neil Goodman

    May 1, 2018 at 2:35 am

    [Oliver Peters] “You need to get current. Our shop has 7 edit stations. All projects and media live on the NAS. Any editor can open any project at any time. The first editor to open a project has write permission to it. Subsequent editors who open it at the same time have read-only permission. You can toggle write control as needed among the users. You can also now have multiple projects open at once (like FCP7) and copy & paste/drag & drop between them. Yes, importing sequences via Media Browser is also still an option.

    I think we are gearing up for it 2018.1 at least – we all just had our OS updated to Sierra from El Capitan, lol. Surprised these old boxes even run Sierra. Looking forward to the new stuff for sure.

Page 2 of 12

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy