Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Reconsidering FCPX in Hollywood
-
Neil Goodman
April 30, 2018 at 11:27 pm[Andy Neil] ” 2 trailer houses,”
which Trailer houses?
I know Charlie is using it over there but curious where else?
-
Shawn Miller
April 30, 2018 at 11:47 pm[Andy Neil] “Only that it can make a lot of sense for those companies that don’t want to rent seats at $50 a pop.”
To be fair, that $50-$85 a month gets you much more than Premiere Pro. I think that’s one of the strengths of the Adobe subscription, the included tools are accessible enough for generalists but deep enough for dedicated specialists – that, and the talent pool for people who know After Effects, Photoshop, Premiere Pro and Illustrator is quite large.
Shawn
-
Oliver Peters
May 1, 2018 at 12:10 am[Andy Neil] “I wonder if the young editors you work with aren’t interested in FCPX because they don’t see it as a space they can advance in?”
I think the answer is multi-faceted. There is certainly the “chicken or the egg” factor. Your odds of getting freelance work are better if you know Premiere than if you [only] know FCPX. However, many of these folks also have an interest in VFX and gaming. So AE is a natural starting point – even before any NLE. Once you work with AE, then the step to Premiere is quick and easy.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Oliver Peters
May 1, 2018 at 12:14 amI think the fact that FCPX still doesn’t have a good answer to collaborative workflows is also a hindrance to adoption in this market.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Neil Goodman
May 1, 2018 at 12:26 am[Oliver Peters] “I think the fact that FCPX still doesn’t have a good answer to collaborative workflows is also a hindrance to adoption in this market.”
Maybe but PPRO’s was pretty lame at it too up until the latest versions (haven’t tried it out myself yet – were still on 2017)
At work now – we have the most ridiculous “shared” workflow ever using PPRO. All the media is on a ISIS and then basically just an Editor exports their latest cut as a PPRO project and then if your the lucky one that picks it up for revisions or cutdowns you import that timeline into your current project. Then repeat until a cut is locked. Its a pain and gets very messy.
I also think alot of it has to do with prospective jobs. If I was in LA and trying to get into TV and Film, it would be dumb to ignore Avid, and secondary PPRO. I aslo find people pay Avid editors higher rates for freelance jobs then jobs on PPRO, and the very very few freelance listings I have seen for FCPX (non bordcast/film) were super duper low. Could have something to do with it too.
-
Bill Davis
May 1, 2018 at 12:43 am[Simon Ubsdell] “One can’t help feeling that if, more than two thirds of the way through its probable lifecycle, you’re still having to proselytise for a product to this degree to a particular market segment, then something is not quite fitting at a basic level.”
Why should should they waste overmuch time proselytizing it at all?
They grew from 2 million to 2.5 millions seats last year. At $299 (presuming nobody at all bought Motion or Compressor) – that’s mathematically just shy of 150 million dollars in FCP X revenue.
If we speculate and imagine that Premier ALSO has 2 million active seats – (clearly not exclusively working pros because no stat I’ve ever seen says there are anywhere near that many actual shop based Pro editors out there – but this is speculation only!) and average between full subscribers and NLE only folks in rental revenue -say $35 a seat? They mathematically generated $70 million bucks, at best, last year? Not a bad business at all, but those two numbers are WAY far apart.
So X, as it sits RIGHT now – is probably a lot more profitable than it’s competitors.
Now if X stops selling tomorrow – and Adobe keeps people on the rental hook for years – it’s a BIG win for Adobe.
But who wants to bet on an Apple collapse like that? Anyone?
So what possible reason would Apple have to switch to a heavy marketing emphasis on the movie Biz?
They likely make significantly more revenue than the competition already – simply by sticking to the marketing path they already are on.
At the end of the day, these are businesses. Folks area happy when a product makes money. And the more the better?
Creator of XinTwo – https://www.xintwo.com
The shortest path to FCP X mastery. -
Andy Neil
May 1, 2018 at 1:36 am[Neil Goodman] “which Trailer houses? “
I had a friend who said they were using it over at Trailer Park. I can’t remember the name of the 2nd place because I was just doing a tour there, but they did a lot of Disney work.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
Oliver Peters
May 1, 2018 at 1:39 am[Neil Goodman] “Maybe but PPRO’s was pretty lame at it too up until the latest versions (haven’t tried it out myself yet – were still on 2017)
At work now – we have the most ridiculous “shared” workflow ever using PPRO. All the media is on a ISIS and then basically just an Editor exports their latest cut as a PPRO project and then if your the lucky one that picks it up for revisions or cutdowns you import that timeline into your current project. Then repeat until a cut is locked. Its a pain and gets very messy. “
You need to get current. Our shop has 7 edit stations. All projects and media live on the NAS. Any editor can open any project at any time. The first editor to open a project has write permission to it. Subsequent editors who open it at the same time have read-only permission. You can toggle write control as needed among the users. You can also now have multiple projects open at once (like FCP7) and copy & paste/drag & drop between them. Yes, importing sequences via Media Browser is also still an option.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Oliver Peters
May 1, 2018 at 1:44 am[Bill Davis] ” and average between full subscribers and NLE only folks in rental revenue -say $35 a seat? They mathematically generated $70 million bucks, at best, last year?”
Your math is off. $35/month x 12 month/year = $420/year/seat. 2,000,000 seats = $840,000,000/year.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Neil Goodman
May 1, 2018 at 2:35 am[Oliver Peters] “You need to get current. Our shop has 7 edit stations. All projects and media live on the NAS. Any editor can open any project at any time. The first editor to open a project has write permission to it. Subsequent editors who open it at the same time have read-only permission. You can toggle write control as needed among the users. You can also now have multiple projects open at once (like FCP7) and copy & paste/drag & drop between them. Yes, importing sequences via Media Browser is also still an option.
“I think we are gearing up for it 2018.1 at least – we all just had our OS updated to Sierra from El Capitan, lol. Surprised these old boxes even run Sierra. Looking forward to the new stuff for sure.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up