Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Storage & Archiving RAID is not a substitute for proper and regular backups (via Ricardo Reyes)

  • RAID is not a substitute for proper and regular backups (via Ricardo Reyes)

    Posted by Bob Zelin on October 28, 2011 at 2:14 am

    This line has been recently quoted by another Creative Cow user, and there is no more accurate statement, than what Ricardo said ……….

    RAID is NOT a substitute for regular backups.

    So the next time one of you babies starts to cry “but I spent all this money for a RAID 5/RAID 6 array, and now I lost all my data” –
    all I can say is SHUT UP you baby, why didn’t you backup or archive properly.

    Bob Zelin

    Christopher Targia replied 14 years, 5 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Fred Jodry

    November 1, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    Normally, RAID is not a good substitute for back-ups but something comes to mind: Why not use a RAID 1 (usually RAID 1) card to drive 2 back-up tape drives to make 2 back-ups at the same time? Fred Jodry

  • Christopher Targia

    November 21, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    so then if you need a backup anyway, why even have a raid6? why not just have multiple raid0 arrays?

    ================================================
    MacPro Octo Core Intel Xenon 2.8Ghz 10GB DDR2 Ram
    FCP 7.0.3
    -I highly recommend el Gato Turbo264HD-

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy