Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy **** quality of still images output via compressor??? – DVPAL after deinterlacing *******

  • **** quality of still images output via compressor??? – DVPAL after deinterlacing *******

    Posted by Wes on July 3, 2006 at 12:15 am

    Hi there,

    I have a DVPAL sequence made up of a combination of video footage and a lot of still (scanned photos) images – some with basic movement.

    When I output with the standard setting in compressor I end up losing alot of the quality of the still images – the deinterlacer filter has been applies in FCP.

    Are there any recommended settings I should be using within compressor???
    Should I be using a different codec in my timeline????

    I’m a bit confused how to get the best end result out of this sequence (which is pretty much finalised so I’m not too keen to rebuild the whole project).

    Any tips would be appreciated, I’ve goota work this out in the next few hours.
    thanks in advance

    Wes replied 19 years, 10 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Wes

    July 3, 2006 at 12:47 am

    After doing further searching I thought I should add the following.

    I think some of the images have not been scanned at a high enough resolution resulting in their poor quality. I tried upresisng them in photoshop as a cheat – this gives a small improvment but there is only so much you can improve.

    Any tips??

  • David Fortin

    July 3, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    Are you editing in the DV codec?

    That could be your undoing. Since I shoot on BetaSP I usually edit using the 8bit uncompressed codec. Last year I did a project that was shot on DV. The client looked at the DVD and said, “why are the edges of the buildings in the photos so blocky? They weren’t like that before.”

    It was the difference in editing in the DV codec. I created a new sequence using the 8bit uncompressed codec and copied everything into it. And the building edges in the scanned photos looked as crisp as ever.

    So if you are editing in DV that could be the problem. And it’s one you sometimes don’t see until you output to MPEG-2 and watch it on your DVD.

    Hope this helps. Good luck.

    David

    Dual 2.5 G5 {OS 10.4.5}
    4.5 GB RAM
    FCP 5.0.4
    NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
    DeckLink SP
    ATTO ExpressPCI UL4S
    Medea Video Raid RT320
    Sony UVW-1800
    Pansonic AG-DV2500
    Media Cleaner Pro 6
    Squeeze 4.2 (PC)
    ViewSonic 19″ LCD
    Optiquest 21″ CRT
    Bella EZ Keyboard

  • Wes

    July 3, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    Thanks David,
    this is what I had ended up trying

    Then just before I sent the 8-bit to compressor I’ve read your post. I now have confidence the results will be good. I’m on a very veru tight deadline and doing an all nighter!!!! so you response was much appreciated

  • Dave Martin

    July 3, 2006 at 8:10 pm

    If you wouldn’t mind…wjhen your deadline is over…could you post your results?

    Tim Martin

    -MacBook Pro – 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo – 2 gig Ram

    -FCP Studio 5.1.1 – QT 7.1 – OSX 10.4.6 – Lacie D2 dv external drive – G-raid dv drive

  • Wes

    July 4, 2006 at 6:53 am

    HI Tim,

    deadline passed thank god!!!

    It’s difficult fo me to quantiify the differnec in results as many of the pics have been delivered at too low a resoultion and had to be rescanned. However there was definately a difference and the 8 bit uncompressed can a better result as DAFsr 1’s post described.

    I will definately go straight to 8 bit next time for any project conatining lots of still pictures. Only dissadvantage is the greater rendering when incorporating DV footage – I’m still flogging a dual G4 and just hanging out for the new Intel Powermacs.

    cheers, wes

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy