-
Quality Downgrade
Hello.
There probably has already been a hell of a lot of threads with this same subject. But here I am, creating yet another one.
I uploaded a few pictures:
– Original footage (raw video, fresh from recording);
– Result of the rendering;
– Settings of the project;
– Template used for rendering;
Anyone can tell me why the quality sucks so much on the result, please?
-
8 Replies
-
Can’t see any pictures here.
-
Weird… you should be able to.
Here’s the links:
https://s13.postimage.org/tbzsma4o5/Original.png
https://s13.postimage.org/lxagtwisl/Result.png
https://s13.postimage.org/4y1ien7l1/Settings.png
https://s13.postimage.org/bpwiv8lyd/Template.png -
Maybe change the field order to None(prog scan), and boost to 60fps.
Gravitate Media Group (GMG)
gravitatemediagroup@gmail.com
http://www.youtube.com/gravitatemediagroup -
Nope. Quality still sucks.
-
Please expand on “quality sucks”.
Other than a levels shift which can be corrected, it didn’t look too bad to me. -
With “level” you mean brightness and contrast? If so, any way of doing that?
Because the result and the original look EXTREMELY different to me. I’m very exigent in the graphical matter, and I want my public to have the same view as I had while I was playing.
I know, the video ends up compressed and changing its format so I DO expect a downgrade in quality, but not as much as it is right now.
-
Drop the Secondary Color Corrector FX on to the Preview window.
Use the “Studio RGB to Computer RGB” preset.
This will set your render to the full 0-255 range instead of the 16-235 range that Vegas uses.
-
I tried that, and I must admit – it is better now. Thank you very much, sir.
Thing is, as I have a crappy connection, so I must use a format that makes the file size smaller. Instead of AVI, I use WMV, which makes the quality slightly crappier, but still looks, well, good.
Anyhow, thank you very much for all of your help, guys.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up