Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy QT display size vs. Native size

  • QT display size vs. Native size

    Posted by Aaron Neitz on September 25, 2008 at 8:49 pm

    Curious: When I export a 1280×720 h.264 QT of of our Flame system via Cleaner for posting -> QT player reports it’s size to be 1280×720. Plays great – even on older Mac laptops.

    If I export the size file (same bitrate, same audio codec) in Quicktime Pro the resulting h.264 is coming out 1248×702 as it’s display size. These files are playing back stuttering on our client’s laptop.

    So what is it that Cleaner is doing vs QT Pro? I have the feeling that QT is forcing a scaling factor on playback that makes the laptop hiccup.

    Unfortunately I’m at a new facility and don’t have Compressor avail to me. Growing pains of a new company.

    Thanks Cows!

    Tom Brooks replied 17 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Rafael Amador

    September 26, 2008 at 1:01 am

    Hi Aaron,
    What happens if you set the proper value in the QT Properties?
    Rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Tom Brooks

    September 29, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Could be a lot of factors relating to settings that the two encoder systems place in the files. Check the movie inspector for both movies and see what else you can find that differs. VBR encoding could allow certain sections to have a very high data rate, causing the laptops to skip frames. The movie inspector in QT Pro will give you the encoded pixel dimension as well as the size it will scale to in order to play the movie on a square pixel display. The final movie should be encoded 1280×720 with square pixels.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy