Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy ProRes versus ProRes HQ

  • ProRes versus ProRes HQ

    Posted by Brad Mirman on April 20, 2010 at 1:59 am

    I shot an interview with a canon R2i 1920×1080 24p. I converted with MPEGStreamclip to ProRes HQ. I knew the file sizes would be huge, but I wasn’t expected anything this big. I want the best quality I can get, but I am thinking this is over kill. Would I be better off with just using Prores or even Prores LT?

    Brad

    Shane Ross replied 16 years, 1 month ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    April 20, 2010 at 5:04 am

    ProRes HQ is for very high end 10-bit recording formats, like AVCIntra and Red. Or things destined for film or digital projection. For DSLRs, DVCPRO HD, HDV, XDCAM…ProRes is JUST fine. ProRes LT is what I use with my T2i, as my videos are destined for the web.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Brad Mirman

    April 20, 2010 at 7:56 am

    What if this was to air on TV? Is ProRes enough? Thanks for the response

  • Shane Ross

    April 20, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    [Brad Mirman] “What if this was to air on TV? Is ProRes enough?”

    Absolutely. I delivered over 60 shows mastered with ProRes. DVCPRO HD is good enough, and it is a lesser codec.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy