Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Problems Compressing to Editable Format

  • Problems Compressing to Editable Format

    Posted by Dave George on November 30, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    Never had this problem before, because I was transferring directly from my Panasonic. Now, however, I’m getting footage from a vendor’s Canon 7D. The clips are H.264, which everyone says isn’t an editing codec. So I use Compressor’s ProRes 422 preset. The result, however, is that the audio has to be rendered in FCP before it will play. I’ve attached the Inspector screenshots for the original file and compressed file, and also my sequence settings in FCP. Can anyone tell me what I’m doing wrong?

    Bonus Question: I put the original H.264 footage on the timeline and it appears to play/edit just fine. Why would that be if H.264 isn’t an editing codec?

    Thanks a million!

    Dave

    Dave George
    Marketing Director

    Dave George replied 14 years, 5 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Todd Gillespie

    November 30, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    Hi Dave,

    Not sure why Compressor defaults to that audio setting, but you are correct that it wouldn’t play back without rendering. You’ll need to re-render the clips, BUT change the audio to PCM 48kHz, 16 Bit (or higher) for the audio-everything should work better after that. You might want to save that as a preset for next time.

    Bonus: While FCP can playback H.264, it’s a SUPER compressed codec, great for viewing, but horrible for editing. If you did use FCP for editing in H.264 it would then SUPER compress any edits you make using that compression, making the video too compressed.

    FWIW

    Todd at UCSB
    Television Production

  • Dave George

    November 30, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    Thanks so much, Todd! Your reply made me realize that I was using my own custom preset, and not Compressor’s. The actual 422 preset does, indeed, compress the audio just fine. (And I’ve changed the setting on my custom preset to PCM, which worked.) Thanks again, man, you saved me a ton of time.

    Dave

    Dave George
    Marketing Director

  • Andrew Rendell

    December 2, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    If I may just pick up on Todd’s explanation of why H.264 isn’t an editing format and expand it a bit:

    H.264 doesn’t compress individual frames, it compresses into blocks containing a series of frames called GOP, which stands for Group Of Pictures. When a computer plays an H.264 file it has to decode blocks of frames to display them, which isn’t a big deal (it’s technically quite complex but modern computers are well up to the task). But when you want to edit the pictures you want to end one clip on a particular frame and start the next clip on a particular frame and there’s every chance that those frames won’t be the last one of a GOP on the outgoing and the first frame of a GOP in the incoming, so to do the edit the computer has to decode the whole of the GOP containing the end frame of the outgoing shot AND the whole of the GOP containing the first frame of the next shot AND create an new GOP showing what you need to see. That’s quite a big processing and memory load for even the most up to date computer (and that re-compressing to make the new GOP is where the picture quality drop that Todd mentioned happens). So what happens is that you can see your clips when you play them and you’ll do a couple of edits and all will appear to be well, then you’ll do another couple of edits and the computer will slow down and pretty soon it will grind to a halt because it’s got too much work to do. Some software and hardware will cope for longer before running into problems, and if you’re working with high quality (broadcast standard) pictures you’ll “hit the wall” much quicker than you would with lower data rate material.

    Most editing codecs, like ProRes, compress each frame separately (which is known as all I-frame), but it’s actually a bit more complicated than it might seem – Sony’s XDCAM is actually a GOP codec but one which does accomodate editing (I could make an educated guess for why that’s the case, but I’m not certain).

  • Dave George

    December 2, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    Wow, my cup runeth over with all this free codec learnin’. I really appreciate it! Andrew, lemme ask you. Having gone through the hell of editing an entire five minute video in H.264, (which I won’t do again) when I exported it and uploaded it to YouTube, I swear it feels jumpy to me. Is that possible? Wouldn’t the export process eliminate that? Would you mind taking a look at this and letting me know if it looks off to you? Thanks!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQfe2wUWfxA&feature=youtu.be

    Dave

    Dave George
    Marketing Director

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy