Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Premiere Pro CC versus FCP X

  • Walter Soyka

    July 23, 2014 at 7:13 pm

    [Devin Crane] “Still misses the point of the thread.”

    I’m not trying to derail the thread, I’m trying to contribute to it.

    If you are citing Premiere Pro’s lack of templates like FCPX/M5 has as a reason you switched away, why wouldn’t the fact that Pr/Ae just added that feature be germane to the conversation?

    I didn’t bring this up to change anybody’s mind. I brought it up to provide relevant information that readers here may be unaware of.

    Oliver, my apologies for the noise.

    Walter Soyka
    Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    @keenlive   |   RenderBreak [blog]   |   Profile [LinkedIn]

  • Andrew Kimery

    July 23, 2014 at 7:26 pm

    I think anytime someone can correct inaccurate information it adds to the discussion.

  • Craig Alan

    July 23, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    Hi David. What is your workflow from Fcp x to resolve and back?

    Mac Pro, macbook pro, Imacs (i7); Canon 5D Mark III/70D, Panasonic AG-HPX170/AG-HPX250P, Canon HV40, Sony Z7U/VX2000/PD170; FCP 6 certified; FCP X write professionally for a variety of media; teach video production in L.A.

  • Oliver Peters

    July 23, 2014 at 7:33 pm

    I appreciate trying to keep it on track, but yes, info is always helpful. I think we can skip the “anti-subscription” replies unless that really was a contributing factor in shifting away from Premiere Pro after having started down that route. What’s more interesting is those folks who really liked Premiere Pro after using it, but for whatever reason have shifted to FCP X. Maybe that’s “tracks versus trackless”, faster editing, the new Mac Pro or change in corporate direction. This isn’t anything formal BTW, just idle curiosity. Thanks.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 23, 2014 at 7:43 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “I appreciate trying to keep it on track, but yes, info is always helpful.”

    Isn’t this the forum where it’s virtually mandatory to have at least a dozen insane (but incredibly interesting) changes of direction per thread?

    😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    tokyo-uk.com

  • David Mathis

    July 23, 2014 at 8:03 pm

    [Craig Alan] “Hi David. What is your workflow from Fcp x to resolve and back?”

    When shooting in ProRes with the Blackmagic Cinema Camera, bring the files into X for editing then export XML, bring into Resolve for correction or grading.

    When shooting in raw I go with a workflow similar to what Denver Riddle from Color Grading Central uses:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpg0k3aD088

    Pretty straightforward workflow.

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Gary Huff

    July 23, 2014 at 9:47 pm

    [Andrew Kimery] “I think anytime someone can correct inaccurate information it adds to the discussion.”

    Actually, people get incensed if you correct anything. They’d prefer to wallow in ignorance apparently.

  • Justin Crowell

    July 23, 2014 at 9:54 pm

    Super slick workaround, Walter! I came up against this issue just yesterday–working with editors who really would struggle to go into AE and adjust the background box for some text. This would totally simplify the process. It also seems sort of future proof to me–not quite sure how Adobe could break that without messing with how expressions work.

    Editor, Producer, DP
    JustinCrowell.com

  • Charlie Austin

    July 23, 2014 at 10:30 pm

    [Walter Soyka] “It’s not as good as the FCPX/M5 rigging/publishing workflow (yet), but it does handle the base case pretty nicely. “

    Does everyone using the templates need to have AE installed?

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Walter Soyka

    July 24, 2014 at 12:25 am

    [Justin Crowell] “uper slick workaround, Walter! I came up against this issue just yesterday–working with editors who really would struggle to go into AE and adjust the background box for some text. This would totally simplify the process. “

    Thanks, Justin. This workflow might be a good fit for you.

    With expressions, you could even automatically resize the type or box based on the length of the text, no additional user-exposed parameters required.

    Walter Soyka
    Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    @keenlive   |   RenderBreak [blog]   |   Profile [LinkedIn]

Page 2 of 9

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy