Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison

  • Premiere Pro 6 to 5.5 frame grab comparison

    Posted by Aindreas Gallagher on March 16, 2012 at 12:19 am

    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3421180/editingasweunderstandit.jpg

    Doesn’t it look a little like the ticket? I half like it?

    chrome razor sharp reduced ala AE, interesting tabs, understood methodology, tasty toolbar etc.
    But i still don’t know why they don’t have a codec. How did they get beaten out by go-pro? Am I stupid in thinking that Adobe are insane not to have the functional industry delivery equivalent to DNX or ProRes? given that if they had, they might actually be about to eat the entire midday sandwich, afternoon tea and dinner of 21C media/production editing sector alive?

    Myself I feel I know AE like the back of my hand – I liked layers in 4.0. And more than a mask per layer in 3.1.
    to be honest: I feel like I know Adobe a lot better than this Cupertino.
    if it runs right, I’m fine with Premiere Pro 6 as the 64 bit FCP.

    http://www.ogallchoir.net
    promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

    Jeremy Garchow replied 14 years, 1 month ago 26 Members · 63 Replies
  • 63 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 16, 2012 at 1:42 am

    Bring on some Speedgrade!

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    March 16, 2012 at 2:05 am

    too right. I genuinely do like the look of this.

    you’d nearly think the determining factors were functionality with regard to the market.

    but that would be insane.

    http://www.ogallchoir.net
    promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 16, 2012 at 3:39 am

    Dynamic Link is very cool.

    But would you go Windows?

  • Gary Huff

    March 16, 2012 at 3:49 am

    [Aindreas Gallagher]But i still don’t know why they don’t have a codec. How did they get beaten out by go-pro? Am I stupid in thinking that Adobe are insane not to have the functional industry delivery equivalent to DNX or ProRes?

    Do we really need another codec in the mix of DNX/ProRes/Cineform, especially considering that Premiere will work with all of them? If you need an intermediate codec at this very moment in Premiere, you can install DNX and Premiere will use it, whether you’re on Win or OSX platforms.

  • Douglas K. dempsey

    March 16, 2012 at 4:19 am

    Right, isn’t the idea to work in whatever native codec you shot, and then output according to deliverable: uncompressed, h.264 etc etc?

    Doug D

  • Steve Connor

    March 16, 2012 at 8:16 am

    I like the new transport controls, one less thing that makes it look like the old Premiere before it became “Pro”

    Steve Connor
    “FCPX Agitator”
    Adrenalin Television

  • Aindreas Gallagher

    March 16, 2012 at 9:06 am

    Correct me because I may well be totally wrong here, but while premiere might be able to read and playback the media with DNX and prores installed and living elsewhere on the system, premiere cannot output any of these formats correct? Isn’t a client likely to be taken aback being given uncompressed as the clean master for a fifteen minute corporate thing? Isn’t that just a gigantic unplayable brick?

    Doesn’t there need to be a play nicely, high quality, proper colour space sort of thing output media container? Like a premiere 4444?

    http://www.ogallchoir.net
    promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics

  • Derek Andonian

    March 16, 2012 at 10:29 am

    I really like the new audio level meters. In previous versions they always seemed way too small to be really useful. These look like they were taken right out of Audition!

    ______________________________________________
    “THAT’S our fail-safe point. Up until here, we still have enough track to stop the locomotive before it plunges into the ravine… But after this windmill it’s the future or bust.”

  • Liam Hall

    March 16, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    It doesn’t look as dated as 5.5, but I t wonder if it’s as clunky…

    Liam Hall
    Director/DoP/Editor
    http://www.liamhall.net

  • Andy Lewis

    March 16, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    Come on Adobe!
    I want a timeline as good as FCP7’s and trimming as good as MC6.

Page 1 of 7

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy