Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › poor rez. on graphics
-
poor rez. on graphics
Posted by Dugan on June 24, 2005 at 5:14 pmI have a new FCP 5 system and it seems like my text graphics (standard name super, etc.) are being output at a less than desirable resolution. It almost seems like only one field is being output. The graphics were created in Photoshop and are TIFFs. I think my problem may be some type of output resolution setting in FCP but I don’t know. Are there any setting w/in FCP that I should double check?
Looking for advice, ASAP….
Kent Esmeier replied 20 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 19 Replies -
19 Replies
-
Shane Ross
June 24, 2005 at 5:33 pmHow you you monitoring the look of your graphics? External NTSC monitor or TV?
Your computer monitor is the worse way to judge the look of your video/titles.
-
Dugan
June 24, 2005 at 5:42 pmI’m monitoring on an external NTSC monitor. I’ve checked my output on tape, & “it still don’t look right.”
-
Michael Horton
June 24, 2005 at 6:22 pmSet your field dominance to NONE. See if it makes a difference. There is something wrong here with FCP 5 and picts
Michael Horton
lafcpug
https://www.lafcpug.org -
Shane Ross
June 24, 2005 at 6:26 pmOK then….
What are the resolution of your PS files? They should be 720×520 in order to work properly in FCP, due to the whole square vs rectangular thing. AND…if you are working in a DV timeline, the nice pristine PS file, when rendered, is compressed into the 5:1 DV compression scheme. This is why working in a DV space with graphics is…well…bad.
If this is going to DVD only, and not to tape, you might consider taking all your DV footage, putting it in an 8-bit uncompressed timeline, THEN adding the PS elements. 8-bit is much more graphics friendly…
Try shifting the image up one pixel…I heard that solves this sometimes…
-
Dugan
June 24, 2005 at 9:09 pmThank you for the advice! I’m going to wrap my brain around your comments and see what I come up with.
TGIF
-
Chris Babbitt
June 24, 2005 at 9:15 pmIf I set the field dominance to None and Motion Filter Quality to Best, the stills and graphics look fabulous, but transitions are stroby. The only combination that looks reasonably good for both is with Field dominance set to lower and Motion Filter Quality set to Fastest.
-
Michael Horton
June 24, 2005 at 10:54 pmAssuming you are rendering in safe mode and high quality, it’s like I said, something aint right here.
Michael Horton
lafcpug
https://www.lafcpug.org -
Chris Babbitt
June 25, 2005 at 3:03 amPlayback video quality is set to Dynamic, but that shouldn’t affect rendered material. Record to Tape is set at Full Quality. If I set Field Dominance to “None”, then any stills with motion and transitions are stroby.
-
Michael Horton
June 25, 2005 at 3:08 am -
Chris Babbitt
June 25, 2005 at 5:27 amIt’s on Safe RT AND Dynamic. It’s not either or. Dynamic was supposed to be a big deal. Are you saying that it doesn’t work?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up