-
Poor man’s asset management
Hi all:
I’m researching asset management options for my company. We’re doing a weekly TV show on a low budget, with lots of features and reports shot “on the street”, and the plan is to digitize the tapes/P2 cards and store them either in a fileserver or a bunch of external drives, so that in the future the editors can access this or that interview (or this or that shot of the city) just by searching them.
Now, an obvious solution for this would be Final Cut Server, except for the problems that: 1) it isn’t shipping yet; 2) nobody has used it yet and reported on how good it is. As an alternative, the “poor man’s solution” that I had thought of was:1) Capture the clips in each tape as separate Quicktime files (“interview1.mov”, “traffic_lights2.mov”, etc.).
2) Have the interns add keywords to the QT clips themselves, using the metadata fields that Quicktime itself provides (see “Window/Show movie properties/Add annotation”).
3) Dump all the QT files in one (or several) external drives.
4) Whenever the editor needs one of them, just plug in the drive and search using Spotlight.I have tried the above in a small scale with some clips in my computer, and it definitely works; Spotlight indexes and finds the keywords that I add to my QT clips. Now, this scheme has the advantage of being infinitely scalable (if a drive fills, just buy another), but the problem is that the editor might end up searching through several drives for the clip she needs. Obviously, we still need a centralized database for metadata, with low-res proxies of the clips and the posibility of adding a field like “This clip is in the HD n